On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 at 14:06, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 1/16/24 10:49, Ritesh Kumar wrote:
Enable Display Subsystem with Novatek NT36672E Panelproperty-n
on qcm6490 idp platform.
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Kumar <quic_riteshk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 100 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts
index 2a6e4907c5ee..efa5252130a1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
#define PM7250B_SID 8
#define PM7250B_SID1 9
+#include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.h>
#include <dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h>
#include "sc7280.dtsi"
#include "pm7250b.dtsi"
@@ -38,6 +39,25 @@
stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8";
};
+ lcd_disp_bias: lcd-disp-bias-regulator {
+ compatible = "regulator-fixed";
+ regulator-name = "lcd_disp_bias";
+ regulator-min-microvolt = <5500000>;
+ regulator-max-microvolt = <5500000>;
+ gpio = <&pm7250b_gpios 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+ enable-active-high;
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ pinctrl-0 = <&lcd_disp_bias_en>;
property-names
all throughout the patch
Missed this.+&gpu {Hm.. generally we disable the GPU in the SoC DT, but that doesn't
+ status = "disabled";
+};
seem to have happened here..
Thinking about it more, is disabling it here necessary? Does it
not fail gracefully?
I'd say, I don't see a reason to disable it at all. The GPU should be
working on sc7280 / qcm4290.