Re: [PATCH 5/8] clk: qcom: support for duplicate freq in RCG2 freq table

From: Ziyang Huang
Date: Mon Jan 22 2024 - 12:33:43 EST


在 2024/1/22 0:57, Andrew Lunn 写道:
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 08:42:34PM +0800, Ziyang Huang wrote:
From: Praveenkumar I <ipkumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Currently RCG code looks up the frequency table during set
rate and return the first available frequency greater than
requested rate. If CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT flag is set then the
set_rate request will go to its parent otherwise the clock
framework will configure pre-div, m and n according to the
returned frequency table entry. In this case, it is assuming
that parent clock will run in the same frequency with which
pre-div, m and n has been derived. But it may be possible
that the parent clock supports multiple frequency and the
same frequency can be derived with different pre-div, m and
n values depending upon current frequency. Also, the same
frequency can be derived from different parent sources and
currently there is no option for having duplicate
frequencies in frequency table and choosing the best one
according to current rate.

Now this patch adds the support for having duplicate
frequencies in frequency table. During set rate, it will
compare the actual rate for each entry with requested rate
and will select the best entry in which the difference will
be less.

The existing functionality won’t be affected with this code
change since this code change will hit only if frequency
table has duplicate values.

A good commit message for a change!


Change-Id: I97d9e1b55d8f3ee095f6f01729af527ba90e50e5
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu <absahu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
(cherry picked from commit 775e7d3b69ffc97afb5bd5a6c9c423f2f4d8a0b2)
Signed-off-by: Praveenkumar I <ipkumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Change-Id: If10193fc79a3c1375ab73597813745ff1f4df0ad

Pick from https://git.codelinaro.org/clo/qsdk/oss/kernel/linux-ipq-5.4/-/commit/6dfb368bae130bee58e00ddf8330b55066e1c8c5

Signed-off-by: Ziyang Huang <hzyitc@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Please clean up these tags. These Change-ID tags are meaningless in
mainline. 775e7d3b69ffc97afb5bd5a6c9c423f2f4d8a0b2 is not in mainline
either. The picked from might be interesting, but please put it into
the body of the commit message, not mixed in with the tags.

Who actually wrote this patch? The first Signed-off-by: is from
Abhishek Sahu. But you have a From of Praveenkumar I ?

I have no idea about this. This patch is from Qualcomm vendor linux code. And it's necessary for choosing parent and calculating clock rate correctly.

What's more, I don't known how to deal with these commit message since I'm not the author and I'm not sure do I have right to edit them even though this is GPL code.


Andrew

---
pw-bot: cr