Re: [PATCH V1] vdpa_sim: reset must not run

From: Stefano Garzarella
Date: Mon Jan 22 2024 - 05:22:11 EST


On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 11:23:23AM -0800, Steve Sistare wrote:
vdpasim_do_reset sets running to true, which is wrong, as it allows
vdpasim_kick_vq to post work requests before the device has been
configured. To fix, do not set running until VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FEATURES_OK
is set.

Fixes: 0c89e2a3a9d0 ("vdpa_sim: Implement suspend vdpa op")
Signed-off-by: Steve Sistare <steven.sistare@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c
index be2925d0d283..6304cb0b4770 100644
--- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c
+++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static void vdpasim_do_reset(struct vdpasim *vdpasim, u32 flags)
}
}

- vdpasim->running = true;
+ vdpasim->running = false;
spin_unlock(&vdpasim->iommu_lock);

vdpasim->features = 0;
@@ -483,6 +483,7 @@ static void vdpasim_set_status(struct vdpa_device *vdpa, u8 status)

mutex_lock(&vdpasim->mutex);
vdpasim->status = status;
+ vdpasim->running = (status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FEATURES_OK) != 0;
mutex_unlock(&vdpasim->mutex);

Should we do something similar also in vdpasim_resume() ?

I mean something like this:

diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c
index be2925d0d283..55e4633d5442 100644
--- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c
+++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c
@@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ static int vdpasim_resume(struct vdpa_device *vdpa)
int i;

mutex_lock(&vdpasim->mutex);
- vdpasim->running = true;
+ vdpasim->running = (vdpasim->status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FEATURES_OK) != 0;

if (vdpasim->pending_kick) {
/* Process pending descriptors */

Thanks,
Stefano