Re: (subset) [PATCH v8 0/7] Add support for LUT PPG

[Lee Jones]

On Tue, 16 Jan 2024, Anjelique Melendez wrote:

> 
> 
> On 1/11/2024 2:07 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Jan 2024, Lee Jones wrote:
> > 
> >> On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 10:58:30 -0800, Anjelique Melendez wrote:
> >>> In certain PMICs, LUT pattern and LPG configuration is stored in SDAM
> >>> modules instead of LUT peripheral. This feature is called PPG.
> >>>
> >>> This change series adds support for PPG. Thanks!
> >>> Changes since v7:
> >>>   - Patch 4/7
> >>>     - Initialize hi/lo_pause variables in lpg_pattern_set()
> >>> Changes since v6:
> >>>   - Patch 2/7
> >>>     - Removed required by constraint on PPG dt properties
> >>> Changes since v5:
> >>>   - Patch 4/7
> >>>     - Update logic so that multicolor led device triggers pattern
> >>>       on all LEDs at the same time
> >>>     - Update nitpicks from Lee
> >>>   - Patch 5/7
> >>>     - Update nitpicks from Lee
> >>> Changes since v4:
> >>>   - Patch 3/7
> >>>     - Get rid of r/w helpers
> >>>     - Use regmap_read_poll_timeout() in qcom_pbs_wait_for_ack()
> >>>     - Update error path in qcom_pbs_trigger_event()
> >>>     - Fix reverse christmas tree
> >>>   - Patch 4/7
> >>>     - Get rid of r/w helpers
> >>>     - Update variables to use "sdam" instead of "nvmem"
> >>>     - Fix comments
> >>>     - Fix reverse christmas tree
> >>>     - Update lpg_pattern_set() logic
> >>>   - Patch 5/7
> >>>     - Removed sdam_lut_base from lpg_data
> >>> Changes since v3:
> >>>   - Patch 4/7
> >>>     - Fix function returns
> >>>     - Move register definition to top of file
> >>>     - Revert max_brightness and probe accidental changes
> >>>     - Combine init_sdam() and parse_sdam()
> >>>     - Change error prints in probe to use dev_err_probe
> >>>     - Remove ppg_en variable
> >>>     - Update when pbs triggers are set/cleared
> >>>   - Patch 6/7
> >>>     - Remove use of nvmem_count
> >>>     - Move register definition to top of file
> >>>     - Remove lpg_get_sdam_lut_idx()
> >>> Changes since v2:
> >>>   - Patch 1/7
> >>>     - Fix dt_binding_check error
> >>>     - Rename binding file to match compatible
> >>>     - Iclude SoC specific comptaibles
> >>>   - Patch 2/7
> >>>     - Update nvmem-names list
> >>>   - Patch 3/7
> >>>     - Update EXPORT_SYMBOL to EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
> >>>     - Fix return/break logic in qcom_pbs_wait_for_ack()
> >>>     - Update iterators to be int
> >>>     - Add constants
> >>>     - Fix function calls in qcom_pbs_trigger_event()
> >>>     - Remove unnessary comments
> >>>     - Return -EPROBE_DEFER from get_pbs_client_device()
> >>> Changes since v1:
> >>>   - Patch 1/7
> >>>     - Fix dt_binding_check errors
> >>>     - Update binding description
> >>>   - Path 2/7
> >>>     - Fix dt_binding_check errors
> >>>     - Update per variant constraints
> >>>     - Update nvmem description
> >>>   - Patch 3/7
> >>>     - Update get_pbs_client_device()
> >>>     - Drop use of printk
> >>>     - Remove unused function
> >>>
> >>> [...]
> >>
> >> Applied, thanks!
> >>
> >> [2/7] dt-bindings: leds: leds-qcom-lpg: Add support for LPG PPG
> >>       commit: 2fdd08fec742e0c94a2a06a0c9ee0912b6f7ac39
> >> [4/7] leds: rgb: leds-qcom-lpg: Add support for PPG through single SDAM
> >>       commit: 07a1afc8fbb77cc893e2285112482902ac88a295
> >> [5/7] leds: rgb: leds-qcom-lpg: Update PMI632 lpg_data to support PPG
> >>       commit: f4f5f6a6f8d7bcc8efd0eee6751def22c9a38fd0
> >> [6/7] leds: rgb: leds-qcom-lpg: Include support for PPG with dedicated LUT SDAM
> >>       commit: 7399a927272de1fc42f4da8af1d8d60b65a15b84
> >> [7/7] leds: rgb: Update PM8350C lpg_data to support two-nvmem PPG Scheme
> >>       commit: 7b4066868689b1f341e61957611d252b6fa8cafc
> > 
> > This set had a bunch of checkpatch.pl errors.
> > 
> > Please fix them up subsequently.
> > 
> Hi Lee,
> 
> Just wanted to get some quick clarification. Would you like checkpatch.pl issues fixed in a new version
> of this series or would you like a new patch to fix all the issues? Looks like these patches are in your
> for-leds-next-next branch so I am guessing you would like a new follow up patch
> but I just wanted to double check.

A follow-up please.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]