[for-linus][PATCH] seq_buf: Make DECLARE_SEQ_BUF() usable

From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Thu Jan 18 2024 - 09:41:31 EST



Another update for 6.8:

- Fix seq_buf warning and make static work properly.


git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/trace/linux-trace.git
trace/urgent

Head SHA1: 7a8e9cdf9405819105ae7405cd91e482bf574b01


Nathan Lynch (1):
seq_buf: Make DECLARE_SEQ_BUF() usable

----
include/linux/seq_buf.h | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
---------------------------
commit 7a8e9cdf9405819105ae7405cd91e482bf574b01
Author: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue Jan 16 08:09:25 2024 -0600

seq_buf: Make DECLARE_SEQ_BUF() usable

Using the address operator on the array doesn't work:

./include/linux/seq_buf.h:27:27: error: initialization of ‘char *’
from incompatible pointer type ‘char (*)[128]’
[-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
27 | .buffer = &__ ## NAME ## _buffer, \
| ^

Apart from fixing that, we can improve DECLARE_SEQ_BUF() by using a
compound literal to define the buffer array without attaching a name
to it. This makes the macro a single statement, allowing constructs
such as:

static DECLARE_SEQ_BUF(my_seq_buf, MYSB_SIZE);

to work as intended.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240116-declare-seq-buf-fix-v1-1-915db4692f32@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: dcc4e5728eea ("seq_buf: Introduce DECLARE_SEQ_BUF and seq_buf_str()")
Signed-off-by: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/include/linux/seq_buf.h b/include/linux/seq_buf.h
index 5fb1f12c33f9..c44f4b47b945 100644
--- a/include/linux/seq_buf.h
+++ b/include/linux/seq_buf.h
@@ -22,9 +22,8 @@ struct seq_buf {
};

#define DECLARE_SEQ_BUF(NAME, SIZE) \
- char __ ## NAME ## _buffer[SIZE] = ""; \
struct seq_buf NAME = { \
- .buffer = &__ ## NAME ## _buffer, \
+ .buffer = (char[SIZE]) { 0 }, \
.size = SIZE, \
}