Re: [RESEND RFC PATCH v1 2/2] serial/8250: Avoid getting lock in RT atomic context

From: John Ogness
Date: Thu Jan 18 2024 - 04:02:30 EST


On 2024-01-16, Leonardo Bras <leobras@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Well, at least in an PREEMPT_RT=y kernel I have found this same bug
> reproducing several times, and through the debugging that I went through I
> saw no mechanism for preventing it.
>
> This is one example of the bug:
> While writing to serial with serial8250_tx_chars in a irq_thread handler
> there is an interruption, and __report_bad_irq() tries to printk
> stuff to the console, and when printk goes down to
> serial8250_console_write() and tried to get the port->lock, which causes
> the "BUG: scheduling while atomic":
>
> [ 42.485878] irq 4: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
> [ 42.485886] BUG: scheduling while atomic: irq/4-ttyS0/751/0x00010002
> [ 42.485890] Modules linked in:
> [ 42.485892] Preemption disabled at:
> [ 42.485893] [<ffffffff8118ac80>] irq_enter_rcu+0x10/0x80
> [ 42.485919] CPU: 0 PID: 751 Comm: irq/4-ttyS0 Not tainted 6.7.0-rc6+ #6

This is 6.7.0-rc6+. How are you setting PREEMPT_RT?

> [ 42.485927] Hardware name: Red Hat KVM/RHEL, BIOS 1.16.3-1.el9 04/01/2014
> [ 42.485929] Call Trace:
> [ 42.485940] <IRQ>
> [ 42.485944] dump_stack_lvl+0x33/0x50
> [ 42.485976] __schedule_bug+0x89/0xa0
> [ 42.485991] schedule_debug.constprop.0+0xd1/0x120
> [ 42.485996] __schedule+0x50/0x690
> [ 42.486026] schedule_rtlock+0x1e/0x40
> [ 42.486029] rtlock_slowlock_locked+0xe7/0x2b0
> [ 42.486047] rt_spin_lock+0x41/0x60
> [ 42.486051] serial8250_console_write+0x1be/0x460

On PREEMPT_RT-patched kernel, serial8250_console_write() is not
compiled. So obviously you are not running a PREEMPT_RT-patched kernel.

> [ 42.486094] console_flush_all+0x18d/0x3c0
> [ 42.486111] console_unlock+0x6c/0xd0

Flushing on console_unlock() is the legacy method.

I assume you are using a mainline kernel with forced threading of
irqs. Mainline has many known problems with console printing, including
calling printk when the port->lock is held.

This has been discussed before [0].

> [ 42.486117] vprintk_emit+0x1d6/0x290
> [ 42.486122] _printk+0x58/0x80
> [ 42.486139] __report_bad_irq+0x26/0xc0
> [ 42.486147] note_interrupt+0x2a1/0x2f0
> [ 42.486155] handle_irq_event+0x84/0x90
> [ 42.486161] handle_edge_irq+0x9f/0x260
> [ 42.486168] __common_interrupt+0x68/0x100
> [ 42.486178] common_interrupt+0x9f/0xc0
> [ 42.486184] </IRQ>

If you want to fix any threaded irq problems relating to printk and
console drivers, please use the latest PREEMPT_RT patch series with
CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT enabled. This is the current work that is being
reviewed on LKML for mainline inclusion. Thanks!

John Ogness

[0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87il5o32w9.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx