Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: display: ti,am65x-dss: Add support for display sharing mode

From: Rob Herring
Date: Wed Jan 17 2024 - 15:13:56 EST


On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 07:11:40PM +0530, Devarsh Thakkar wrote:
> Add support for using TI Keystone DSS hardware present in display
> sharing mode.
>
> TI Keystone DSS hardware supports partitioning of resources between
> multiple hosts as it provides separate register space and unique
> interrupt line to each host.
>
> The DSS hardware can be used in shared mode in such a way that one or
> more of video planes can be owned by Linux wherease other planes can be
> owned by remote cores.
>
> One or more of the video ports can be dedicated exclusively to a
> processing core, wherease some of the video ports can be shared between
> two hosts too with only one of them having write access.
>
> Signed-off-by: Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@xxxxxx>
> ---
> .../bindings/display/ti/ti,am65x-dss.yaml | 82 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/ti/ti,am65x-dss.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/ti/ti,am65x-dss.yaml
> index 55e3e490d0e6..d9bc69fbf1fb 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/ti/ti,am65x-dss.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/ti/ti,am65x-dss.yaml
> @@ -112,6 +112,86 @@ properties:
> Input memory (from main memory to dispc) bandwidth limit in
> bytes per second
>
> + ti,dss-shared-mode:
> + type: boolean
> + description:
> + TI DSS7 supports sharing of display between multiple hosts
> + as it provides separate register space for display configuration and
> + unique interrupt line to each host.

If you care about line breaks, you need '|'.

> + One of the host is provided access to the global display
> + configuration labelled as "common" region of DSS allows that host
> + exclusive access to global registers of DSS while other host can
> + configure the display for it's usage using a separate register
> + space labelled as "common1".
> + The DSS resources can be partitioned in such a way that one or more
> + of the video planes are owned by Linux whereas other video planes

Your h/w can only run Linux?

What if you want to use this same binding to define the configuration to
the 'remote processor'? You can easily s/Linux/the OS/, but it all
should be reworded to describe things in terms of the local processor.

> + can be owned by a remote core.
> + The video port controlling these planes acts as a shared video port
> + and it can be configured with write access either by Linux or the
> + remote core in which case Linux only has read-only access to that
> + video port.

What is the purpose of this property when all the other properties are
required?

> +
> + ti,dss-shared-mode-planes:
> + description:
> + The video layer that is owned by processing core running Linux.
> + The display driver running from Linux has exclusive write access to
> + this video layer.
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string
> + enum: [vidl, vid]
> +
> + ti,dss-shared-mode-vp:
> + description:
> + The video port that is being used in context of processing core
> + running Linux with display susbsytem being used in shared mode.
> + This can be owned either by the processing core running Linux in
> + which case Linux has the write access and the responsibility to
> + configure this video port and the associated overlay manager or
> + it can be shared between core running Linux and a remote core
> + with remote core provided with write access to this video port and
> + associated overlay managers and remote core configures and drives
> + this video port also feeding data from one or more of the
> + video planes owned by Linux, with Linux only having read-only access
> + to this video port and associated overlay managers.
> +
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string
> + enum: [vp1, vp2]
> +
> + ti,dss-shared-mode-common:
> + description:
> + The DSS register region owned by processing core running Linux.
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string
> + enum: [common, common1]
> +
> + ti,dss-shared-mode-vp-owned:
> + description:
> + This tells whether processing core running Linux has write access to
> + the video ports enlisted in ti,dss-shared-mode-vps.
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> + enum: [0, 1]

This can be boolean. Do writes abort or just get ignored? The latter can
be probed and doesn't need a property.

> +
> + ti,dss-shared-mode-plane-zorder:
> + description:
> + The zorder of the planes owned by Linux.
> + For the scenario where Linux is not having write access to associated
> + video port, this field is just for
> + informational purpose to enumerate the zorder configuration
> + being used by remote core.
> +
> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> + enum: [0, 1]

I don't understand how 0 or 1 defines Z-order.

> +
> +dependencies:
> + ti,dss-shared-mode: [ 'ti,dss-shared-mode-planes', 'ti,dss-shared-mode-vp',
> + 'ti,dss-shared-mode-plane-zorder', 'ti,dss-shared-mode-vp-owned']
> + ti,dss-shared-mode-vp: ['ti,dss-shared-mode', 'ti,dss-shared-mode-planes',
> + 'ti,dss-shared-mode-plane-zorder', 'ti,dss-shared-mode-vp-owned']
> + ti,dss-shared-mode-planes: ['ti,dss-shared-mode', 'ti,dss-shared-mode-vp',
> + 'ti,dss-shared-mode-plane-zorder', 'ti,dss-shared-mode-vp-owned']
> + ti,dss-shared-mode-plane-zorder: ['ti,dss-shared-mode-planes', 'ti,dss-shared-mode-vp',
> + 'ti,dss-shared-mode', 'ti,dss-shared-mode-vp-owned']
> + ti,dss-shared-mode-vp-owned: ['ti,dss-shared-mode-planes', 'ti,dss-shared-mode-vp',
> + 'ti,dss-shared-mode', 'ti,dss-shared-mode-plane-zorder']
> +
> allOf:
> - if:
> properties:
> @@ -123,6 +203,8 @@ allOf:
> ports:
> properties:
> port@0: false
> + ti,dss-shared-mode-vp:
> + enum: [vp2]

This should throw a warning. You just defined a property called 'enum'.

Rob