Re: [PATCH 5/6] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5332: Add RDP441 board device tree

From: Lei Wei
Date: Wed Jan 17 2024 - 10:17:51 EST




On 1/10/2024 7:57 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 10/01/2024 12:20, Luo Jie wrote:
From: Lei Wei <quic_leiwei@xxxxxxxxxxx>

RDP441 board has onboard QCA8386 switch and 10G SFP port.

Signed-off-by: Lei Wei <quic_leiwei@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Luo Jie <quic_luoj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5332-rdp441.dts | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5332-rdp441.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5332-rdp441.dts
index 846413817e9a..d51968e9d601 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5332-rdp441.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5332-rdp441.dts
@@ -12,6 +12,15 @@
/ {
model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. IPQ5332 MI01.2";
compatible = "qcom,ipq5332-ap-mi01.2", "qcom,ipq5332";
+
+ soc@0 {

Nope, DTS does not define soc nodes.

OK, I will remove the soc node in the DTS file. SFP node should not be inside the soc node.

+ sfp1: sfp-1 {

Why is this soc? Where is the MMIO address?

Sure, SoC node should not be required. I will remove the soc node.


+ compatible = "sff,sfp";
+ i2c-bus = <&blsp1_i2c1>;
+ los-gpios = <&tlmm 45 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+ tx-disable-gpios = <&tlmm 24 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+ };
+ };
};
&blsp1_i2c1 {
@@ -63,3 +72,45 @@ data-pins {
};
};
};
+
+&qcom_ppe {
+ qcom,port_phyinfo {

Eh... We talk now about basics: please don't post downstream code, but
first clean it up from all the junk. All the basic issues which you have
in downstream and which we do not accept upstream.

I do not believe that this code passed internal review.

NAK.

Sure, got it. I will follow the upstream principles to use generic node name.


Best regards,
Krzysztof