[PATCH] selftests/hid: wacom: fix confidence tests

[Benjamin Tissoires]

The device is exported with a fuzz of 4, meaning that the `+ t` here
is removed by the fuzz algorithm, making those tests failing.

Not sure why, but when I run this locally it was passing, but not in the
VM.

Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/bentiss/hid/-/jobs/53692957#L3315
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Over the break the test suite wasn't properly running on my runner,
and this small issue sneaked in.
---
 tools/testing/selftests/hid/tests/test_wacom_generic.py | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/hid/tests/test_wacom_generic.py b/tools/testing/selftests/hid/tests/test_wacom_generic.py
index 352fc39f3c6c..b62c7dba6777 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/hid/tests/test_wacom_generic.py
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/hid/tests/test_wacom_generic.py
@@ -880,8 +880,8 @@ class TestDTH2452Tablet(test_multitouch.BaseTest.TestMultitouch, TouchTabletTest
         does not overlap with other contacts. The value of `t` may be
         incremented over time to move the point along a linear path.
         """
-        x = 50 + 10 * contact_id + t
-        y = 100 + 100 * contact_id + t
+        x = 50 + 10 * contact_id + t * 11
+        y = 100 + 100 * contact_id + t * 11
         return test_multitouch.Touch(contact_id, x, y)
 
     def make_contacts(self, n, t=0):
@@ -902,8 +902,8 @@ class TestDTH2452Tablet(test_multitouch.BaseTest.TestMultitouch, TouchTabletTest
         tracking_id = contact_ids.tracking_id
         slot_num = contact_ids.slot_num
 
-        x = 50 + 10 * contact_id + t
-        y = 100 + 100 * contact_id + t
+        x = 50 + 10 * contact_id + t * 11
+        y = 100 + 100 * contact_id + t * 11
 
         # If the data isn't supposed to be stored in any slots, there is
         # nothing we can check for in the evdev stream.

---
base-commit: 80d5a73edcfbd1d8d6a4c2b755873c5d63a1ebd7
change-id: 20240117-b4-wip-wacom-tests-fixes-298b50bea47f

Best regards,
-- 
Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@xxxxxxxxxx>