RE: [RFC PATCH v3 00/11] Add support for Intel PPS Generator

[D, Lakshmi Sowjanya]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Hilber <peter.hilber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2024 5:15 PM
> To: D, Lakshmi Sowjanya <lakshmi.sowjanya.d@xxxxxxxxx>; Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; jstultz@xxxxxxxxxx; giometti@xxxxxxxxxxxx;
> corbet@xxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; x86@xxxxxxxxxx;
> netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; intel-wired-
> lan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Dong, Eddie <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>; Hall, Christopher S
> <christopher.s.hall@xxxxxxxxx>; Brandeburg, Jesse
> <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx>; davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> alexandre.torgue@xxxxxxxxxxx; joabreu@xxxxxxxxxxxx;
> mcoquelin.stm32@xxxxxxxxx; perex@xxxxxxxx; linux-sound@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> Nguyen, Anthony L <anthony.l.nguyen@xxxxxxxxx>; N, Pandith
> <pandith.n@xxxxxxxxx>; Sangannavar, Mallikarjunappa
> <mallikarjunappa.sangannavar@xxxxxxxxx>; T R, Thejesh Reddy
> <thejesh.reddy.t.r@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/11] Add support for Intel PPS Generator
> 
> On 09.01.24 07:31, D, Lakshmi Sowjanya wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Sent: Saturday, January 6, 2024 8:50 PM
> >> To: D, Lakshmi Sowjanya <lakshmi.sowjanya.d@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; jstultz@xxxxxxxxxx; giometti@xxxxxxxxxxxx;
> >> corbet@xxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; x86@xxxxxxxxxx;
> >> netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; intel-wired-
> >> lan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Dong, Eddie <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>; Hall,
> >> Christopher S <christopher.s.hall@xxxxxxxxx>; Brandeburg, Jesse
> >> <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx>; davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> >> alexandre.torgue@xxxxxxxxxxx; joabreu@xxxxxxxxxxxx;
> >> mcoquelin.stm32@xxxxxxxxx; perex@xxxxxxxx;
> >> linux-sound@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Nguyen, Anthony L
> >> <anthony.l.nguyen@xxxxxxxxx>; N, Pandith <pandith.n@xxxxxxxxx>;
> >> Sangannavar, Mallikarjunappa <mallikarjunappa.sangannavar@xxxxxxxxx>;
> >> T R, Thejesh Reddy <thejesh.reddy.t.r@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/11] Add support for Intel PPS Generator
> >>
> [...]
> >> At some point you should announce v1 of the series. RFC is usually
> >> being neglected by many (busy) maintainers.
> >
> > This patch series is dependent on
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231215220612.173603-2-
> peter.hilber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/ which is RFC.
> 
> So I understand my dependency series being RFC prevents the PPS series from
> dropping the RFC tag (correct me if I am wrong).
> 
> I plan to send out a non-RFC version of the dependency series next. So far I think
> there will only be polishing changes. Due to testing being some effort, I wanted
> to test and send it together with some other series.
> 
> But if this is blocking the PPS series, I think I could send out a non-RFC version of
> the dependency series earlier (by the end of January?). Please let me know what
> would align with the PPS series timeline.

Thanks Peter,
This timeline should be okay. We will also send non-RFC v1 by the same time.

Regards,
Sowjanya

> Regards,
> 
> Peter
> 
> >
> > Regards,
> > Sowjanya
> >>
> >> --
> >> With Best Regards,
> >> Andy Shevchenko
> >>
> >