Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] x86/mm/pat: Cleanup unused parameter in follow_phys

From: kernel test robot
Date: Fri Jan 12 2024 - 01:36:17 EST


Hi Wupeng,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-everything]
[also build test WARNING on tip/x86/mm tip/master linus/master v6.7 next-20240111]
[cannot apply to tip/auto-latest]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Wupeng-Ma/x86-mm-pat-Move-follow_phys-to-pat-related-file/20240111-201305
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240111120929.2694440-3-mawupeng1%40huawei.com
patch subject: [PATCH v3 2/3] x86/mm/pat: Cleanup unused parameter in follow_phys
config: i386-alldefconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240112/202401121454.wuRFNxQE-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240112/202401121454.wuRFNxQE-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202401121454.wuRFNxQE-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c: In function 'follow_phys':
>> arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c:972:1: warning: label 'unlock' defined but not used [-Wunused-label]
972 | unlock:
| ^~~~~~


vim +/unlock +972 arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c

5899329b19100c arch/x86/mm/pat.c venkatesh.pallipadi@xxxxxxxxx 2008-12-18 952
b4e07d9667b7ae arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c Ma Wupeng 2024-01-11 953 static int follow_phys(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
76b476f1ffb4bf arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c Ma Wupeng 2024-01-11 954 unsigned long address, unsigned long *prot,
76b476f1ffb4bf arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c Ma Wupeng 2024-01-11 955 resource_size_t *phys)
b4e07d9667b7ae arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c Ma Wupeng 2024-01-11 956 {
b4e07d9667b7ae arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c Ma Wupeng 2024-01-11 957 int ret = -EINVAL;
b4e07d9667b7ae arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c Ma Wupeng 2024-01-11 958 pte_t *ptep, pte;
b4e07d9667b7ae arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c Ma Wupeng 2024-01-11 959 spinlock_t *ptl;
b4e07d9667b7ae arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c Ma Wupeng 2024-01-11 960
b4e07d9667b7ae arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c Ma Wupeng 2024-01-11 961 if (!(vma->vm_flags & (VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP)))
b4e07d9667b7ae arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c Ma Wupeng 2024-01-11 962 goto out;
b4e07d9667b7ae arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c Ma Wupeng 2024-01-11 963
b4e07d9667b7ae arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c Ma Wupeng 2024-01-11 964 if (follow_pte(vma->vm_mm, address, &ptep, &ptl))
b4e07d9667b7ae arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c Ma Wupeng 2024-01-11 965 goto out;
b4e07d9667b7ae arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c Ma Wupeng 2024-01-11 966 pte = ptep_get(ptep);
b4e07d9667b7ae arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c Ma Wupeng 2024-01-11 967
b4e07d9667b7ae arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c Ma Wupeng 2024-01-11 968 *prot = pgprot_val(pte_pgprot(pte));
b4e07d9667b7ae arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c Ma Wupeng 2024-01-11 969 *phys = (resource_size_t)pte_pfn(pte) << PAGE_SHIFT;
b4e07d9667b7ae arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c Ma Wupeng 2024-01-11 970
b4e07d9667b7ae arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c Ma Wupeng 2024-01-11 971 ret = 0;
b4e07d9667b7ae arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c Ma Wupeng 2024-01-11 @972 unlock:
b4e07d9667b7ae arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c Ma Wupeng 2024-01-11 973 pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl);
b4e07d9667b7ae arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c Ma Wupeng 2024-01-11 974 out:
b4e07d9667b7ae arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c Ma Wupeng 2024-01-11 975 return ret;
b4e07d9667b7ae arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c Ma Wupeng 2024-01-11 976 }
b4e07d9667b7ae arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c Ma Wupeng 2024-01-11 977

--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki