Re: [PATCH RFC v2 01/11] dt-bindings: gpu: Rename img,powervr to img,powervr-rogue

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Tue Jan 09 2024 - 13:55:54 EST


On 09/01/2024 17:14, Andrew Davis wrote:
> On 1/9/24 5:28 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 08/01/2024 19:32, Andrew Davis wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@xxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> .../bindings/gpu/{img,powervr.yaml => img,powervr-rogue.yaml} | 4 ++--
>>> MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
>>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> If you are renaming it, why not renaming to match compatible as we
>> usually expect?
>>
>
> There are (or will be) multiple compatible strings described in this
> file, naming the file after just one would not fully convey the content
> of the file. This generic style naming seems common already for bindings
> with multiple compatibles.

I saw only one compatible used as fallback. Where are more?

Best regards,
Krzysztof