Re: [PATCH] swiotlb: check alloc_size before the allocation of a new memory pool

From: Petr Tesarik
Date: Mon Jan 08 2024 - 10:47:32 EST


On 1/8/2024 3:00 PM, Peng Zhang wrote:
> From: ZhangPeng <zhangpeng362@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The allocation request for swiotlb contiguous memory greater than
> 128*2KB cannot be fulfilled because it exceeds the maximum contiguous
> memory limit. If the swiotlb memory we allocate is larger than 128*2KB,
> swiotlb_find_slots() will still schedule the allocation of a new memory
> pool, which will increase memory overhead.
>
> Fix it by adding a check with alloc_size no more than 128*2KB before
> scheduling the allocation of a new memory pool in swiotlb_find_slots().
>
> Signed-off-by: ZhangPeng <zhangpeng362@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> index 33d942615be5..cc92cff02c60 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> @@ -1126,6 +1126,9 @@ static int swiotlb_find_slots(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t orig_addr,
> u64 phys_limit;
> int index;
>
> + if (alloc_size > IO_TLB_SEGSIZE * IO_TLB_SIZE)
> + return -1;
> +
> rcu_read_lock();
> list_for_each_entry_rcu(pool, &mem->pools, node) {
> index = swiotlb_pool_find_slots(dev, pool, orig_addr,

IIUC this such big allocations are not normally required by drivers, but
I have already run into a similar issue with a Raspberry Pi 4 dma-buf
object, so they can be triggered at will by user space. I also believe
this sanity check is a good idea in general, not only when dynamic
SWIOTLB is enabled.

Reviewed-by: Petr Tesarik <petr.tesarik1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Petr T