Re: [PATCH 1/1] Refactor radeon driver to use drm_gem_create_map_offset() instead of its custom implementation for associating GEM object with a fake offset. Since, we already have a generic implementation, we don't need the custom function and it is better to standardize the code.

From: Christian König
Date: Mon Jan 08 2024 - 01:45:27 EST


Am 06.01.24 um 15:14 schrieb Dipam Turkar:
Signed-off-by: Dipam Turkar <dipamt1729@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gem.c | 24 ++----------------------
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c
index fa531493b111..f590ed65ffba 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c
@@ -578,7 +578,7 @@ static const struct drm_driver kms_driver = {
.ioctls = radeon_ioctls_kms,
.num_ioctls = ARRAY_SIZE(radeon_ioctls_kms),
.dumb_create = radeon_mode_dumb_create,
- .dumb_map_offset = radeon_mode_dumb_mmap,
+ .dumb_map_offset = drm_gem_dumb_map_offset,
.fops = &radeon_driver_kms_fops,
.gem_prime_import_sg_table = radeon_gem_prime_import_sg_table,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gem.c
index 358d19242f4b..99794c550d2c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_gem.c
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
#include <drm/drm_device.h>
#include <drm/drm_file.h>
+#include <drm/dem_gem.h>
#include <drm/drm_gem_ttm_helper.h>
#include <drm/radeon_drm.h>
@@ -480,33 +481,12 @@ int radeon_gem_set_domain_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
return r;
}
-int radeon_mode_dumb_mmap(struct drm_file *filp,
- struct drm_device *dev,
- uint32_t handle, uint64_t *offset_p)
-{
- struct drm_gem_object *gobj;
- struct radeon_bo *robj;
-
- gobj = drm_gem_object_lookup(filp, handle);
- if (gobj == NULL) {
- return -ENOENT;
- }
- robj = gem_to_radeon_bo(gobj);
- if (radeon_ttm_tt_has_userptr(robj->rdev, robj->tbo.ttm)) {

Well apart from the obvious typos, the missing commit message and the mangled subject line this also removes this important check for userptrs here.

This in turn is a complete no-go since it can lead to kernel crashes.

Regards,
Christian.

- drm_gem_object_put(gobj);
- return -EPERM;
- }
- *offset_p = radeon_bo_mmap_offset(robj);
- drm_gem_object_put(gobj);
- return 0;
-}
-
int radeon_gem_mmap_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
struct drm_file *filp)
{
struct drm_radeon_gem_mmap *args = data;
- return radeon_mode_dumb_mmap(filp, dev, args->handle, &args->addr_ptr);
+ return drm_gem_dumb_map_offset(filp, dev, args->handle, &args->addr_ptr);
}
int radeon_gem_busy_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,