Re: [PATCH 1/3] media: dt-bindings: media: camss: Add qcom,sc8280xp-camss binding

From: Bryan O'Donoghue
Date: Thu Jan 04 2024 - 06:34:04 EST


On 03/01/2024 17:54, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 09:40:02AM +0000, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
On 03/01/2024 07:40, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 03/01/2024 03:18, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
Add bindings for qcom,sc8280xp-camss in order to support the camera
subsystem for sc8280xp as found in the Lenovo x13s Laptop.

Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../bindings/media/qcom,sc8280xp-camss.yaml | 512 +++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 512 insertions(+)


This patch fails, as pointed out by Robot.

Best regards,
Krzysztof



Ah its in Bjorn's 6.8 clock pull tree.

I will repost when it hits -next

How is that helpful? It will still fail, and the media maintainers still
can't apply this. If you work on linux-next, you'd better be
aware of and explain the dependencies.

Rob

Well, it actually is in -next as at the time I posted this patch

https://git.codelinaro.org/bryan.odonoghue/kernel/-/blob/linux-next-24-01-02-sc8280xp-camss-core-dtsi/include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,sc8280xp-camcc.h

per the branch referenced in the cover letter

https://git.codelinaro.org/bryan.odonoghue/kernel/-/tree/linux-next-24-01-02-sc8280xp-camss-core-dtsi

Looking at the name of the branch for your bot

20240103-linux-next-24-01-02-sc8280xp-camss-core-dtsi-v1-1-abacaa63a961@xxxxxxxxxx

Does this branch name in the bot output "linux-next-24-01-02-sc8280xp-camss-core-dtsi-v1" imply it built from the branch I referenced in the cover letter "linux-next-24-01-02-sc8280xp-camss-core-dtsi" ?

Am I getting the base of the build right ?

https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20240103-linux-next-24-01-02-sc8280xp-camss-core-dtsi-v1-1-abacaa63a961@xxxxxxxxxx/

If not - what is the base of the build ?

---
bod