Re: [PATCH net-next v5 02/13] net: sfp: pass the phy_device when disconnecting an sfp module's PHY

From: Maxime Chevallier
Date: Wed Jan 03 2024 - 12:45:43 EST


Hi Russell,

On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 15:20:25 +0000
"Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 07:00:35PM +0100, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> > Pass the phy_device as a parameter to the sfp upstream .disconnect_phy
> > operation. This is preparatory work to help track phy devices across
> > a net_device's link.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > V5: No changes
> > V4: No changes
> > V3: No changes
> >
> > drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 8 ++++++++
> > drivers/net/phy/phylink.c | 3 ++-
> > drivers/net/phy/sfp-bus.c | 4 ++--
> > include/linux/sfp.h | 2 +-
> > 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> > index d7c0812bd107..aad78e3f7894 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> > @@ -266,6 +266,14 @@ static void phy_mdio_device_remove(struct mdio_device *mdiodev)
> >
> > static struct phy_driver genphy_driver;
> >
> > +static struct phy_link_topology *phy_get_link_topology(struct phy_device *phydev)
> > +{
> > + if (phydev->attached_dev)
> > + return &phydev->attached_dev->link_topo;
> > +
> > + return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > static LIST_HEAD(phy_fixup_list);
> > static DEFINE_MUTEX(phy_fixup_lock);
> >
>
> This should be in a different patch, it seems unrelated to the remainder
> of this patch, and as it's static and no other changes to this file,
> this would cause a build warning.

Arg looks like I squashed that bit here to the wrong commit while
rebasing, it should have been part of commit 03/13 indeed... Sorry for
the hiccup.

Maxime