Re: [PATCH] bnxt: fix building without CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL

From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Wed Jan 03 2024 - 11:03:25 EST


On Wed, Jan 3, 2024, at 16:46, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 11:23:11AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
>>
>> A recent patch series generalized the filter logic in bnxt to no
>> longer just be used for RFS, but it now fails to build when RFS_ACCEL
>> is disabled:
>>
>> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c: In function 'bnxt_cfg_ntp_filters':
>> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c:14077:37: error: implicit declaration of function 'rps_may_expire_flow' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> 14077 | if (rps_may_expire_flow(bp->dev, fltr->base.rxq,
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> Add back one #ifdef check around a call to the missing rps_may_expire_flow()
>> function.
>>
>> Fixes: 59cde76f33fa ("bnxt_en: Refactor filter insertion logic in bnxt_rx_flow_steer().")
>> Cc: Michael Chan <michael.chan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> I don't know if this is a correct fix, only checked that it is plausible
>> and that it does address the build failure. If a different fix is needed,
>> please just treat this as a bug report.
>
> Are you using a kernel config with CONFIG_SMP=n ? That was how I was
> able to reproduce this.

I saw this in two randconfig test builds on 32-bit arm, both with
SMP disabled, though I did not expect that to make a difference.

In case it helps, this is one of the two config files:
https://pastebin.com/raw/uxHEXzG2

> There is a good oppportunity to clean this up a little better. When
> CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL is not set there is no reason to even have
> bnxt_cfg_ntp_filters included in the driver build.
>
> I'll talk to Michael and we will post a fix for this.

Ok, thanks!

Arnd