Re: [PATCH v7 08/23] sched: Split scheduler and execution contexts

[Valentin Schneider]

On 19/12/23 16:18, John Stultz wrote:
> NOTE: Peter previously mentioned he didn't like the name
> "rq_selected()", but I've not come up with a better alternative.
> I'm very open to other name proposals.
>

I got used to the naming relatively quickly. It "should" be rq_pick()
(i.e. what did the last pick_next_task() return for that rq), but that
naming is unfortunately ambiguous (is it doing a pick itself?), so I think
"selected" works.