Re: [PATCH RFC 00/17] ubifs: Add filesystem repair support

[Richard Weinberger]

----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "chengzhihao1" <chengzhihao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
> How about merging 3(a) and 3(b) as one mode(dangerous mode)? If fsck can
> get a good TNC(all non-leaf index nodes are valid), fsck executes as
> 3(a) describes. If fsck cannot find a good TNC, fsck executes as 3(b)
> and reminds user that "TNC is damaged, nodes dropping is not awared".

Well, you can make all modes combinable.
Right now I don't care much about the user interface.
But offering much flexibility is a worthwhile goal.

At the end it should be crystal clear to the user of fsck.ubifs whether
it fixed the file system by applying dangerous methods or not.

Want I want to avoid by all means is a tool which blindly alters
the filesystem just to stop UBIFS complaining about it.

Thanks,
//richard