Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: Add device tree property to set max MTU

From: Siddharth Vadapalli
Date: Tue Jan 02 2024 - 05:33:40 EST


Hello,

On 02-01-2024 13:49, Sanjuán García, Jorge wrote:
> The switch supports ethernet frame sizes between 64 and 2024 bytes
> (including VLAN) as stated in the technical reference manual.

Could you please share the source for the "2024 bytes" mentioned above?
In J7200 SoC's TRM, I see support for up to 9604 bytes (including VLAN)
in the "CPSW_PN_RX_MAXLEN_REG_k" register description for CPSW5G
instance of CPSW.

>
> This patch adds a new devicetree property so the switch ports can
> be configured with an MTU higher than the standar 1500 bytes, making

nitpick: standar/standard.

> the max frame length configured on the registers and the max_mtu
> advertised on the network device consistent.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jorge Sanjuan Garcia <jorge.sanjuangarcia@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

For patches which add new features, please use the subject prefix
[PATCH net-next].

> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c
> index a920146d7a60..6a5c8b6e03f4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c
> @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
> #define AM65_CPSW_MAX_PORTS 8
>
> #define AM65_CPSW_MIN_PACKET_SIZE VLAN_ETH_ZLEN
> -#define AM65_CPSW_MAX_PACKET_SIZE (VLAN_ETH_FRAME_LEN + ETH_FCS_LEN)
> +#define AM65_CPSW_MAX_PACKET_SIZE 2024
>
> #define AM65_CPSW_REG_CTL 0x004
> #define AM65_CPSW_REG_STAT_PORT_EN 0x014
> @@ -2198,8 +2198,7 @@ am65_cpsw_nuss_init_port_ndev(struct am65_cpsw_common
> *common, u32 port_idx)
> eth_hw_addr_set(port->ndev, port->slave.mac_addr);
>
> port->ndev->min_mtu = AM65_CPSW_MIN_PACKET_SIZE;
> - port->ndev->max_mtu = common->rx_packet_max -
> - (VLAN_ETH_HLEN + ETH_FCS_LEN);
> + port->ndev->max_mtu = common->max_mtu;

This seems to be modifying what was added in just the previous patch.
Isn't it better to merge these changes into a single patch?

> port->ndev->hw_features = NETIF_F_SG |
> NETIF_F_RXCSUM |
> NETIF_F_HW_CSUM |
> @@ -2927,8 +2926,19 @@ static int am65_cpsw_nuss_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (common->port_num < 1 || common->port_num > AM65_CPSW_MAX_PORTS)
> return -ENOENT;
>
> + common->max_mtu = VLAN_ETH_DATA_LEN;
> + of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "max-frame-size", &common->max_mtu);

The device-tree property "max-frame-size" is a port-specific property.
Therefore, it is wrong to expect the property to be present at the CPSW
node level instead of being present within each port in the
"ethernet-ports" node. This section should be moved into the function:
am65_cpsw_nuss_init_slave_ports()
which parses the device-tree nodes for each port. The "max-frame-size"
property can be stored there on a per-port basis within a newly added
member in "struct am65_cpsw_port" as mentioned in my previous mail for
patch 2/3.

> +
> + common->rx_packet_max = common->max_mtu + VLAN_ETH_HLEN + ETH_FCS_LEN;
> + if (common->rx_packet_max > AM65_CPSW_MAX_PACKET_SIZE) {
> + common->rx_packet_max = AM65_CPSW_MAX_PACKET_SIZE;
> + common->max_mtu = AM65_CPSW_MAX_PACKET_SIZE -
> + (VLAN_ETH_HLEN + ETH_FCS_LEN);
> + }
> +
> + dev_info(common->dev, "Max RX packet size set to %d\n",
> common->rx_packet_max);
> +
> common->rx_flow_id_base = -1;
> - common->rx_packet_max = AM65_CPSW_MAX_PACKET_SIZE;
> init_completion(&common->tdown_complete);
> common->tx_ch_num = AM65_CPSW_DEFAULT_TX_CHNS;
> common->pf_p0_rx_ptype_rrobin = false;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.h
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.h
> index 141160223d73..3bb0ff94a46a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.h
> @@ -130,6 +130,7 @@ struct am65_cpsw_common {
> u32 tx_ch_rate_msk;
> u32 rx_flow_id_base;
>
> + int max_mtu;
> int rx_packet_max;
>
> struct am65_cpsw_tx_chn tx_chns[AM65_CPSW_MAX_TX_QUEUES];

...

--
Regards,
Siddharth.