On 13.09.2023 13:14, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:Is there any one continue working on this?
On 13/09/2023 12:48, Konrad Dybcio wrote:Ok, I'll resend, thanks for confirming!
On 13.09.2023 10:53, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 13/09/2023 10:47, Konrad Dybcio wrote:So is your reply essentially "fine, but please make it clear in
On 13.09.2023 09:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 12/09/2023 15:31, Konrad Dybcio wrote:I believe we've been over this already..
These clocks are now handled from within the icc framework and are
That's a driver behavior, not hardware.
The rationale behind this change is: that hardware, which falls
under the "interconnect" class, was previously misrepresented as
a bunch of clocks. There are clocks underneath, but accessing them
directly would be equivalent to e.g. circumventing the PHY subsystem
and initializing your UFS PHY from within the UFS device.
And every time one write such commit msg, how should we remember there
is some exception and actually it is about clock representation not CCF
or ICC framework.
each commit message"?
I am fine with this change. If commit msg had such statement, I would
not have doubts :/
Konrad
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel