Re: [PATCH next 0/5] locking/osq_lock: Optimisations to osq_lock code

[Waiman Long]

On 12/30/23 17:39, David Laight wrote:
> From: Linus Torvalds
> > Sent: 30 December 2023 19:41
> >
> > On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 at 12:52, David Laight <David.Laight@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > David Laight (5):
> > >    Move the definition of optimistic_spin_node into osf_lock.c
> > >    Clarify osq_wait_next()
> > I took these two as preparatory independent patches, with that
> > osq_wait_next() clarification split into two.
> >
> > I also did the renaming that Waiman asked for.
> Ok, I'll try to remove them from any respin.
> (Or at least put them first!)

The first 2 patches have been included in Linus' master branch. So you 
should just remove them from a respin.

Cheers,
Longman