Re: [PATCH] riscv: add CALLER_ADDRx support

From: Zong Li
Date: Fri Dec 29 2023 - 01:35:11 EST


On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 5:00 PM Zong Li <zong.li@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> CALLER_ADDRx returns caller's address at specified level, they are used
> for several tracers. These macros eventually use
> __builtin_return_address(n) to get the caller's address if arch doesn't
> define their own implementation.
>
> In RISC-V, __builtin_return_address(n) only works when n == 0, we need
> to walk the stack frame to get the caller's address at specified level.
>
> data.level started from 'level + 3' due to the call flow of getting
> caller's address in RISC-V implementation. If we don't have additional
> three iteration, the level is corresponding to follows:
>
> callsite -> return_address -> arch_stack_walk -> walk_stackframe
> | | | |
> level 3 level 2 level 1 level 0
>
> Signed-off-by: Zong Li <zong.li@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/asm/ftrace.h | 5 ++++
> arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile | 2 ++
> arch/riscv/kernel/return_address.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 55 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/return_address.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/ftrace.h
> index 2b2f5df7ef2c..42777f91a9c5 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/ftrace.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/ftrace.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,11 @@
>
> #define ARCH_SUPPORTS_FTRACE_OPS 1
> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> +
> +extern void *return_address(unsigned int level);
> +
> +#define ftrace_return_address(n) return_address(n)
> +
> void MCOUNT_NAME(void);
> static inline unsigned long ftrace_call_adjust(unsigned long addr)
> {
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
> index fee22a3d1b53..40d054939ae2 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ ifdef CONFIG_FTRACE
> CFLAGS_REMOVE_ftrace.o = $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE)
> CFLAGS_REMOVE_patch.o = $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE)
> CFLAGS_REMOVE_sbi.o = $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE)
> +CFLAGS_REMOVE_return_address.o = $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE)
> endif
> CFLAGS_syscall_table.o += $(call cc-option,-Wno-override-init,)
> CFLAGS_compat_syscall_table.o += $(call cc-option,-Wno-override-init,)
> @@ -46,6 +47,7 @@ obj-y += irq.o
> obj-y += process.o
> obj-y += ptrace.o
> obj-y += reset.o
> +obj-y += return_address.o
> obj-y += setup.o
> obj-y += signal.o
> obj-y += syscall_table.o
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/return_address.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/return_address.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c2008d4aa6e5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/return_address.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * This code come from arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2023 SiFive.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/export.h>
> +#include <linux/kprobes.h>
> +#include <linux/stacktrace.h>
> +
> +struct return_address_data {
> + unsigned int level;
> + void *addr;
> +};
> +
> +static bool save_return_addr(void *d, unsigned long pc)
> +{
> + struct return_address_data *data = d;
> +
> + if (!data->level) {
> + data->addr = (void *)pc;
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + --data->level;
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(save_return_addr);
> +
> +void *return_address(unsigned int level)
> +{
> + struct return_address_data data;
> +
> + data.level = level + 3;
> + data.addr = NULL;
> +
> + arch_stack_walk(save_return_addr, &data, current, NULL);
> +
> + if (!data.level)
> + return data.addr;
> + else
> + return NULL;
> +
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(return_address);
> +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(return_address);
> --
> 2.17.1
>

Hi Palmer and all,
I was wondering whether this patch is good for everyone? Thanks