Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: coresight: Update the pattern of ete node name

[Jinlong Mao]

On 12/21/2023 4:44 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 21/12/2023 09:36, Jinlong Mao wrote:
> > On 12/21/2023 4:17 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > On 21/12/2023 09:15, Jinlong Mao wrote:
> > > > On 12/21/2023 4:12 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > > > On 21/12/2023 04:28, Jinlong Mao wrote:
> > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,embedded-trace-extension.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,embedded-trace-extension.yaml
> > > > > > > > index f725e6940993..cbf583d34029 100644
> > > > > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,embedded-trace-extension.yaml
> > > > > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,embedded-trace-extension.yaml
> > > > > > > > @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ description: |
> > > > > > > >      
> > > > > > > >      properties:
> > > > > > > >        $nodename:
> > > > > > > > -    pattern: "^ete([0-9a-f]+)$"
> > > > > > > > +    pattern: "^ete-([0-9a-f]+)$"
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > My concerns are not resolved. Why is it here in the first place?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Krzysztof,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ETE is acronym of embedded trace extension. The number of the name is
> > > > > > the same as the number of the CPU it belongs to.
> > > > >
> > > > > This is obvious and was not my question.
> > > >
> > > > Do you mean why the pattern match of the node name is added here ?
> > >
> > > Yes, especially that it is requiring a non-generic name.
> > >
> > > > This node should not have the node name match, right ?
> > >
> > > Usually. For sure shouldn't be for non-generic names.
> > Hi Suzuki,
> >
> > Can we remove the pattern match of the node name and use a generic name
> > "ete" for the ete DT nodes ?
>
> "ete" is not a generic name. What is generic here? It's an acronym of
> some specific device name.

The device full name is embedded trace extension. So use ETE as the name 
here.

Thanks
Jinlong Mao

>