Re: [RFC] nvme-tcp: fix a possible double-free after failed to send request

[Sagi Grimberg]

On 12/22/23 13:12, zhangyanjun@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Yanjun Zhang <zhangyanjun@xxxxxxxx>
>
> In storage clusters constructed by nvme-tcp driver, we have encountered
> the following crash on the host kernel severval times.
>
> [248514.030873] nvme nvme1: failed to send request -13
> [248514.035916] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [248514.035918] kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:379!
> [248514.037647] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
> [248514.039416] CPU: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/0:1H Kdump: loaded Tainted: G S                5.15.67-6.cl9.x86_64 #1
> [248514.041376] Hardware name: CECLOUD CeaStor 16114/BC13MBSBC, BIOS 1.37 02/24/2023
> [248514.043433] Workqueue: nvme_tcp_wq nvme_tcp_io_work [nvme_tcp]
> [248514.045576] RIP: 0010:__slab_free+0x16a/0x320
> [248514.047751] Code: 24 20 e8 69 28 78 00 44 8b 44 24 0c 4c 8b 54 24 10 44 0f b6 5c 24 1b 0f b6 74 24 1c 48 89 04 24 4c 8b 4c 24 20 e9 28 ff ff ff <0f> 0b 41 f7 46 08 00 0d 21 00 75 a0 4d 85 ed 75 9b 80 4c 24 5b 80
> [248514.052500] RSP: 0018:ff51b1a6c0273bf0 EFLAGS: 00010246
> [248514.054798] RAX: ff2378e68268b800 RBX: 0000000080080004 RCX: ff2378e68268b000
> [248514.057038] RDX: ff2378e68268b000 RSI: ffca59110c09a200 RDI: ff2378a480034d00
> [248514.059245] RBP: ff51b1a6c0273c90 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffffffc0901a0a
> [248514.061386] R10: ff2378e68268b000 R11: ffffffff86e06000 R12: ffca59110c09a200
> [248514.063423] R13: ff2378e68268b000 R14: ff2378a480034d00 R15: 0000000000000078
> [248514.065428] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ff2378d32fe00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> [248514.067456] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [248514.069531] CR2: 00007f4759e1c800 CR3: 0000001b5e5a6005 CR4: 0000000000771ef0
> [248514.071706] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> [248514.073916] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> [248514.076130] PKRU: 55555554
> [248514.078392] Call Trace:
> [248514.080640]  <TASK>
> [248514.082898]  ? sk_stream_alloc_skb+0x66/0x2e0
> [248514.085231]  ? tcp_skb_entail+0x11d/0x130
> [248514.087595]  ? tcp_build_frag+0xf0/0x390
> [248514.089980]  ? nvme_complete_rq+0x1a/0x1f0 [nvme_core]
> [248514.092433]  kfree+0x215/0x240
> [248514.094918]  nvme_complete_rq+0x1a/0x1f0 [nvme_core]
> [248514.097469]  nvme_tcp_recv_pdu+0x534/0x570 [nvme_tcp]
> [248514.100070]  nvme_tcp_recv_skb+0x4f/0x23e [nvme_tcp]
> [248514.102699]  ? nvme_tcp_recv_pdu+0x570/0x570 [nvme_tcp]
> [248514.105317]  tcp_read_sock+0xa0/0x270
> [248514.107958]  nvme_tcp_try_recv+0x65/0xa0 [nvme_tcp]
> [248514.110666]  ? nvme_tcp_try_send+0x16b/0x200 [nvme_tcp]
> [248514.113431]  nvme_tcp_io_work+0x4d/0xa0 [nvme_tcp]
> [248514.116247]  process_one_work+0x1e8/0x390
> [248514.119085]  worker_thread+0x53/0x3d0
> [248514.121980]  ? process_one_work+0x390/0x390
> [248514.124887]  kthread+0x124/0x150
> [248514.127835]  ? set_kthread_struct+0x50/0x50
> [248514.130836]  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
> [248514.133841]  </TASK>
>
> By analyzing the vmcore, we know the direct cause is that the slab object
> request->special_vec was freed twicely. According to the error message
> "nvme nvme1: failed to send request -13" and nvme_tcp_request->state =
> NVME_TCP_SEND_DATA, the pdu has been send by nvme_tcp_try_send_cmd_pdu.

So what exactly failed to send? incapsule date? Or h2cdata?

> And the nvme_tcp_fail_request would execute nvme_complete_rq after failed
> to send data.

That is correct.

> Then the nvme_tcp_recv_pdu may receive the responding pdu

Which PDU was that? Isn't the controller expecting request data?

> and the nvme_tcp_process_nvme_cqe would complete the request again. To
> avoid this slab object double-free issuse, we try to make the following
> code modifications, can you give some suggestions, thanks!
>
> Signed-off-by: Yanjun Zhang <zhangyanjun@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c | 3 +++
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c
> index 08805f027..84f724558 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/tcp.c
> @@ -581,6 +581,9 @@ static int nvme_tcp_process_nvme_cqe(struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue,
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   	}
>   
> +	if (!blk_mq_request_started(rq))
> +		return 0;

First, I want to understand if this is a spurious completion, meaning is
this suggesting a protection against a misbehaving controller? Or there
was actually something that the host got wrong?

Because this sort of check does not belong in the tcp driver.