Re: [PATCH v7 00/23] Proxy Execution: A generalized form of Priority Inheritance v7

[John Stultz]

On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 12:35 AM Metin Kaya <metin.kaya@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 20/12/2023 12:18 am, John Stultz wrote:
> >
> > As Connor outlined in a previous submission of this patch series,
>
> Nit: Better to have a reference to Connor's patch series (i.e.,
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221003214501.2050087-1-connoro@xxxxxxxxxx/)
> here?

Yes, thank you for providing the link!


> > * As discussed at OSPM[5], I like to split pick_next_task() up
> >    into two phases selecting and setting the next tasks, as
> >    currently pick_next_task() assumes the returned task will be
> >    run which results in various side-effects in sched class logic
> >    when it’s run. I tried to take a pass at this earlier, but
> >    it’s hairy and lower on the priority list for now.
>
> Do you think we should mention virtual runqueue idea and adding trace
> points to measure task migration times? They are not "open issues", but
> kind of to-do items in the agenda.
>

I appreciate you bringing those up. The virtual runqueue idea is still
a bit handwavy, but the trace points are a good item for the TODO.
Apologies for missing it, as you suggested it just the other day as I
was prepping these patches, and I didn't go back to add it here in the
cover letter.

thanks
-john