Re: [PATCH v2 21/22] platform: Modify platform_get_irq_optional() to use resource

From: Andy Shevchenko
Date: Thu Dec 21 2023 - 10:33:39 EST


On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 04:54:35PM -0700, Mark Hasemeyer wrote:
> Unify handling of ACPI, GPIO, devictree, and platform resource
> interrupts in platform_get_irq_optional(). Each of these subsystems
> provide their own APIs which provide IRQ information as a struct
> resource. This simplifies the logic of the function and allows callers
> to get more information about the IRQ by looking at the resource flags.
> For example, whether or not an IRQ is wake capable.

...

> * For example::
> *
> - * int irq = platform_get_irq_optional(pdev, 0);
> + * int irq = platform_get_irq_resource_optional(pdev, 0, &res);
> * if (irq < 0)
> * return irq;
> *
> * Return: non-zero IRQ number on success, negative error number on failure.

Why do we need the irq to be returned via error code?

...

> int ret;

Missing blank line, have you run checkpatch.pl?

> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(r))
> + return -EINVAL;

If we ever have an error pointer in r, I prefer to see

if (!r)
return -EINVAL;
if (IS_ERR(r))
return PTR_ERR(r);

But Q is the same as earlier: when would we have the error pointer in @r?

...

> + platform_res = platform_get_resource(dev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, num);

I would move this closer to the condition...

> /*
> * The resources may pass trigger flags to the irqs that need
> * to be set up. It so happens that the trigger flags for
> * IORESOURCE_BITS correspond 1-to-1 to the IRQF_TRIGGER*
> * settings.
> */

...i.e. here.

> - if (r && r->flags & IORESOURCE_BITS) {
> + if (platform_res && platform_res->flags & IORESOURCE_BITS) {

> }

...

> if (num == 0 && is_acpi_device_node(fwnode)) {
> - ret = acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get(to_acpi_device_node(fwnode), num);
> + ret = acpi_dev_get_gpio_irq_resource(to_acpi_device_node(fwnode), NULL, num, r);
> /* Our callers expect -ENXIO for missing IRQs. */

> - if (ret >= 0 || ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + if (!ret || ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) {

Can we save this and be consistent with above fwnode API return code check?

> + ret = ret ?: r->start;
> goto out;
> + }
> }

...

> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_get_irq_optional);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_get_irq_resource_optional);
> +

Stray blank line change.

...

> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(platform_get_irq);
>
> +

Ditto.

...

> +int platform_get_irq_optional(struct platform_device *dev, unsigned int num)
> +{
> + struct resource r;

struct resource r = {};

?

> + return platform_get_irq_resource_optional(dev, num, &r);
> +}

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko