Re: [External] Re: [PATCH] riscv: put va_kernel_xip_pa_offset into CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL

[yunhui cui]

Hi Conor，Alex

On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 6:35 AM Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 10:14:59PM +0100, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
> > Hi Yunhui,
> >
> > On 20/12/2023 11:34, Yunhui Cui wrote:
> > > opitmize the kernel_mapping_pa_to_va() and kernel_mapping_va_to_pa().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Yunhui Cui <cuiyunhui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >   arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> > >   1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h
> > > index 5488ecc337b6..0d2b479d02cd 100644
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h
> > > @@ -113,8 +113,8 @@ struct kernel_mapping {
> > >     unsigned long va_pa_offset;
> > >     /* Offset between kernel mapping virtual address and kernel load address */
> > >     unsigned long va_kernel_pa_offset;
> > > -   unsigned long va_kernel_xip_pa_offset;
> > >   #ifdef CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL
> > > +   unsigned long va_kernel_xip_pa_offset;
> > >     uintptr_t xiprom;
> > >     uintptr_t xiprom_sz;
> > >   #endif
> > > @@ -134,12 +134,25 @@ extern phys_addr_t phys_ram_base;
> > >   #else
> > >   void *linear_mapping_pa_to_va(unsigned long x);
> > >   #endif
> > > -#define kernel_mapping_pa_to_va(y) ({                                      \
> > > -   unsigned long _y = (unsigned long)(y);                                  \
> > > -   (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL) && _y < phys_ram_base) ?                 \
> > > -           (void *)(_y + kernel_map.va_kernel_xip_pa_offset) :             \
> > > -           (void *)(_y + kernel_map.va_kernel_pa_offset + XIP_OFFSET);     \
> > > -   })
> > > +
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL
> > > +#define kernel_mapping_pa_to_va(y)                                                 \
> > > +   (((unsigned long)(y) < phys_ram_base) ?                                         \
> > > +           (void *)((unsigned long)(y) + kernel_map.va_kernel_xip_pa_offset) :     \
> > > +           (void *)((unsigned long)(y) + kernel_map.va_kernel_pa_offset + XIP_OFFSET))
> > > +
> > > +#define kernel_mapping_va_to_pa(y)                                         \
> > > +   (((unsigned long)(y) < kernel_map.virt_addr + XIP_OFFSET) ?             \
> > > +           ((unsigned long)(y) - kernel_map.va_kernel_xip_pa_offset) :     \
> > > +           ((unsigned long)(y) - kernel_map.va_kernel_pa_offset - XIP_OFFSET))
> > > +#else
> > > +#define kernel_mapping_pa_to_va(y)                                         \
> > > +   ((void *)((unsigned long)(y) + kernel_map.va_kernel_pa_offset + XIP_OFFSET))
> > > +
> > > +#define kernel_mapping_va_to_pa(y)                                         \
> > > +   ((unsigned long)(y) - kernel_map.va_kernel_pa_offset - XIP_OFFSET)
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > >   #define __pa_to_va_nodebug(x)             linear_mapping_pa_to_va(x)
> > >   #ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL
> > > @@ -147,12 +160,6 @@ void *linear_mapping_pa_to_va(unsigned long x);
> > >   #else
> > >   phys_addr_t linear_mapping_va_to_pa(unsigned long x);
> > >   #endif
> > > -#define kernel_mapping_va_to_pa(y) ({                                              \
> > > -   unsigned long _y = (unsigned long)(y);                                  \
> > > -   (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL) && _y < kernel_map.virt_addr + XIP_OFFSET) ? \
> > > -           (_y - kernel_map.va_kernel_xip_pa_offset) :                     \
> > > -           (_y - kernel_map.va_kernel_pa_offset - XIP_OFFSET);             \
> > > -   })
> > >   #define __va_to_pa_nodebug(x)     ({                                              \
> > >     unsigned long _x = x;                                                   \
> >
> >
> > Not sure using #ifdef optimizes anything since the compiler should do the
> > same with the IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL) and it does not really improve
> > the readability of this file which is already overloaded with #ifdef, so I
> > don't think this change is needed.
>
> I would say that we explicitly do not want to move things that are
> guarded by IS_ENABLED() to ifdeffery. In fact, we should move things in
> the other direction if possible, especially for stuff like XIP_KERNEL
> that nobody ever build tests.

The point of this patch is that logically, like xiprom and xiprom_sz,
stuct kernel_mapping.va_kernel_xip_pa_offset should be included in
CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL.

I believe we can agree on this, right?

Thanks,
Yunhui