Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: core: Let the sq_lock protect sq_tail_slot access

From: Manivannan Sadhasivam
Date: Wed Dec 20 2023 - 12:00:37 EST


On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 08:35:18AM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 12/20/23 06:50, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 07:32:17AM -0800, Can Guo wrote:
> > > If access sq_tail_slot without the protection from the sq_lock, race
> > > condition can have multiple SQEs copied to duplicate SQE slot(s), which can
> > > lead to multiple incredible stability issues. Fix it by moving the *dest
> > > initialization, in ufshcd_send_command(), back under protection from the
> > > sq_lock.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 3c85f087faec ("scsi: ufs: mcq: Use pointer arithmetic in ufshcd_send_command()")
> >
> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Hmm ... is the "Cc: stable" tag really required if a "Fixes:" tag is present?
>

Yes it is required as I pointed out in the other thread.

- Mani

> Bart.
>

--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்