Re: [PATCH 3/5] clk: sunxi-ng: nm: Support constraints on n/m ratio and parent rate

From: Jernej Škrabec
Date: Tue Dec 19 2023 - 11:52:56 EST


Dne ponedeljek, 18. december 2023 ob 14:35:21 CET je Frank Oltmanns napisal(a):
> The Allwinner A64 manual lists the following constraint for the
> PLL-VIDEO0 clock: 8 <= N/M <= 25
>
> The PLL-MIPI clock is implemented as ccu_nm. Therefore, add support for
> this constraint.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Oltmanns <frank@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nm.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nm.h | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nm.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nm.c
> index ffac3deb89d6..cfc6981e398b 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nm.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nm.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,19 @@ static unsigned long ccu_nm_calc_rate(unsigned long parent,
> return rate;
> }
>
> +static bool ccu_nm_is_valid_rate(struct ccu_common *common, unsigned long n, unsigned long m)
> +{
> + struct ccu_nm *nm = container_of(common, struct ccu_nm, common);
> +
> + if (nm->max_nm_ratio && (n > nm->max_nm_ratio * m))
> + return false;
> +
> + if (nm->min_nm_ratio && (n < nm->min_nm_ratio * m))
> + return false;
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> static unsigned long ccu_nm_find_best(struct ccu_common *common, unsigned long parent,
> unsigned long rate, struct _ccu_nm *nm)
> {
> @@ -36,8 +49,12 @@ static unsigned long ccu_nm_find_best(struct ccu_common *common, unsigned long p
>
> for (_n = nm->min_n; _n <= nm->max_n; _n++) {
> for (_m = nm->min_m; _m <= nm->max_m; _m++) {
> - unsigned long tmp_rate = ccu_nm_calc_rate(parent,
> - _n, _m);
> + unsigned long tmp_rate;
> +
> + if (!ccu_nm_is_valid_rate(common, _n, _m))
> + continue;
> +
> + tmp_rate = ccu_nm_calc_rate(parent, _n, _m);
>
> if (ccu_is_better_rate(common, rate, tmp_rate, best_rate)) {
> best_rate = tmp_rate;
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nm.h b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nm.h
> index 93c11693574f..0075df6d9697 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nm.h
> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu_nm.h
> @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ struct ccu_nm {
> unsigned int fixed_post_div;
> unsigned int min_rate;
> unsigned int max_rate;
> + unsigned long min_nm_ratio; /* minimum value for m/n */
> + unsigned long max_nm_ratio; /* maximum value for m/n */

Comment is wrong, it should be "n/m". For consistency with nkm patch,
min_n_m_ratio and max_n_m_ratio.

Best regards,
Jernej

>
> struct ccu_common common;
> };
> @@ -108,7 +110,8 @@ struct ccu_nm {
> }, \
> }
>
> -#define SUNXI_CCU_NM_WITH_FRAC_GATE_LOCK_MIN_MAX_FEAT(_struct, _name, \
> +#define SUNXI_CCU_NM_WITH_FRAC_GATE_LOCK_MIN_MAX_FEAT_NM_RATIO( \
> + _struct, _name, \
> _parent, _reg, \
> _min_rate, _max_rate, \
> _nshift, _nwidth, \
> @@ -117,7 +120,9 @@ struct ccu_nm {
> _frac_rate_0, \
> _frac_rate_1, \
> _gate, _lock, _flags, \
> - _features) \
> + _features, \
> + _min_nm_ratio, \
> + _max_nm_ratio) \
> struct ccu_nm _struct = { \
> .enable = _gate, \
> .lock = _lock, \
> @@ -128,6 +133,8 @@ struct ccu_nm {
> _frac_rate_1), \
> .min_rate = _min_rate, \
> .max_rate = _max_rate, \
> + .min_nm_ratio = _min_nm_ratio, \
> + .max_nm_ratio = _max_nm_ratio, \
> .common = { \
> .reg = _reg, \
> .features = _features, \
> @@ -138,6 +145,29 @@ struct ccu_nm {
> }, \
> }
>
> +#define SUNXI_CCU_NM_WITH_FRAC_GATE_LOCK_MIN_MAX_FEAT(_struct, _name, \
> + _parent, _reg, \
> + _min_rate, _max_rate, \
> + _nshift, _nwidth, \
> + _mshift, _mwidth, \
> + _frac_en, _frac_sel, \
> + _frac_rate_0, \
> + _frac_rate_1, \
> + _gate, _lock, _flags, \
> + _features) \
> + SUNXI_CCU_NM_WITH_FRAC_GATE_LOCK_MIN_MAX_FEAT_NM_RATIO( \
> + _struct, _name, \
> + _parent, _reg, \
> + _min_rate, _max_rate, \
> + _nshift, _nwidth, \
> + _mshift, _mwidth, \
> + _frac_en, _frac_sel, \
> + _frac_rate_0, \
> + _frac_rate_1, \
> + _gate, _lock, _flags, \
> + _features, \
> + 0, 0)
> +
> #define SUNXI_CCU_NM_WITH_FRAC_GATE_LOCK_MIN_MAX(_struct, _name, \
> _parent, _reg, \
> _min_rate, _max_rate, \
>
>