Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] coresight-tpdm: Add CMB dataset support
From: Suzuki K Poulose
Date: Tue Dec 19 2023 - 08:56:42 EST
On 19/12/2023 09:22, Tao Zhang wrote:
On 12/18/2023 6:34 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
On 21/11/2023 02:24, Tao Zhang wrote:
CMB (continuous multi-bit) is one of TPDM's dataset type. CMB subunit
can be enabled for data collection by writing 1 to the first bit of
CMB_CR register. This change is to add enable/disable function for
CMB dataset by writing CMB_CR register.
Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jinlong Mao <quic_jinlmao@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.h | 8 +++++
2 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
index 97654aa4b772..c8bb38822e08 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.c
@@ -131,6 +131,11 @@ static bool tpdm_has_dsb_dataset(struct
tpdm_drvdata *drvdata)
return (drvdata->datasets & TPDM_PIDR0_DS_DSB);
}
+static bool tpdm_has_cmb_dataset(struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata)
+{
+ return (drvdata->datasets & TPDM_PIDR0_DS_CMB);
+}
+
static umode_t tpdm_dsb_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
struct attribute *attr, int n)
{
@@ -267,6 +272,17 @@ static void tpdm_enable_dsb(struct tpdm_drvdata
*drvdata)
writel_relaxed(val, drvdata->base + TPDM_DSB_CR);
}
+static void tpdm_enable_cmb(struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata)
+{
+ u32 val;
+
+ val = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + TPDM_CMB_CR);
+ val |= TPDM_CMB_CR_ENA;
+
+ /* Set the enable bit of CMB control register to 1 */
+ writel_relaxed(val, drvdata->base + TPDM_CMB_CR);
+}
+
/*
* TPDM enable operations
* The TPDM or Monitor serves as data collection component for various
@@ -281,6 +297,8 @@ static void __tpdm_enable(struct tpdm_drvdata
*drvdata)
if (tpdm_has_dsb_dataset(drvdata))
tpdm_enable_dsb(drvdata);
+ if (tpdm_has_cmb_dataset(drvdata))
+ tpdm_enable_cmb(drvdata);
Don't we need to add this check in the "property read" section ?
Otherwise, we could generate warnings unnecessarily ?
i.e, if (tpdm_has_cmb_..())
rc |= fwnode_..read_property(cmb-elem-size...)
Similarly for DSB.
TPDM and TPDA are two independent hardware. If you want to modify them
in this way, the
You don't have to, as long as the header files are included ?
Read my response in the other patch, where it applies.
Suzuki
two independent drivers will be coupled to each other. At the same time,
this configuration
is manually set in the devicetree by the users, and this check cannot
avoid manual setting errors.
Even if the configuration is wrong, it will not cause the driver to
stop working, it will only cause
the data to be lost from the TPDM.
CS_LOCK(drvdata->base);
}
@@ -314,6 +332,17 @@ static void tpdm_disable_dsb(struct tpdm_drvdata
*drvdata)
writel_relaxed(val, drvdata->base + TPDM_DSB_CR);
}
+static void tpdm_disable_cmb(struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata)
+{
+ u32 val;
+
+ val = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + TPDM_CMB_CR);
+ val &= ~TPDM_CMB_CR_ENA;
+
+ /* Set the enable bit of CMB control register to 0 */
+ writel_relaxed(val, drvdata->base + TPDM_CMB_CR);
+}
+
/* TPDM disable operations */
static void __tpdm_disable(struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata)
{
@@ -321,6 +350,8 @@ static void __tpdm_disable(struct tpdm_drvdata
*drvdata)
if (tpdm_has_dsb_dataset(drvdata))
tpdm_disable_dsb(drvdata);
+ if (tpdm_has_cmb_dataset(drvdata))
+ tpdm_disable_cmb(drvdata);
minor nit: Instead of having these :
if (tpdm_has_XY_()
tpdm_{enable/disable}_XY_()
I prefer :
tpdm_{enable/disable}_XY_
and the helper take care of returning early if the feature is
not present.
Does the following sample modification meet your expectation?
static void tpdm_disable_dsb(struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata)
{
u32 val;
if (tpdm_has_dsb_dataset(drvdata)) {
/* Set the enable bit of DSB control register to 0 */
val = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + TPDM_DSB_CR);
val &= ~TPDM_DSB_CR_ENA;
writel_relaxed(val, drvdata->base + TPDM_DSB_CR);
}
}
static void tpdm_disable_cmb(struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata)
{
u32 val;
if (tpdm_has_cmb_dataset(drvdata)) {
val = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + TPDM_CMB_CR);
val &= ~TPDM_CMB_CR_ENA;
/* Set the enable bit of CMB control register to 0 */
writel_relaxed(val, drvdata->base + TPDM_CMB_CR);
}
}
/* TPDM disable operations */
static void __tpdm_disable(struct tpdm_drvdata *drvdata)
{
CS_UNLOCK(drvdata->base);
tpdm_disable_dsb(drvdata);
tpdm_disable_cmb(drvdata);
Yes, thats exactly I was looking for.
CS_LOCK(drvdata->base);
}
Best,
Tao
Suzuki
CS_LOCK(drvdata->base);
}
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.h
b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.h
index 4115b2a17b8d..0098c58dfdd6 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.h
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tpdm.h
@@ -9,6 +9,12 @@
/* The max number of the datasets that TPDM supports */
#define TPDM_DATASETS 7
+/* CMB Subunit Registers */
+#define TPDM_CMB_CR (0xA00)
+
+/* Enable bit for CMB subunit */
+#define TPDM_CMB_CR_ENA BIT(0)
+
/* DSB Subunit Registers */
#define TPDM_DSB_CR (0x780)
#define TPDM_DSB_TIER (0x784)
@@ -79,10 +85,12 @@
*
* PERIPHIDR0[0] : Fix to 1 if ImplDef subunit present, else 0
* PERIPHIDR0[1] : Fix to 1 if DSB subunit present, else 0
+ * PERIPHIDR0[2] : Fix to 1 if CMB subunit present, else 0
*/
#define TPDM_PIDR0_DS_IMPDEF BIT(0)
#define TPDM_PIDR0_DS_DSB BIT(1)
+#define TPDM_PIDR0_DS_CMB BIT(2)
#define TPDM_DSB_MAX_LINES 256
/* MAX number of EDCR registers */