Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] cxl/cdat: Fix header sum value in CDAT checksum

[Dan Williams]

Ira Weiny wrote:
> Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 17:33:04 -0800
> > Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231116-fix-cdat-devm-free-v1-1-b148b40707d7@xxxxxxxxx/
> > > 
> > > Fixes: aba578bdace5 ("hw/cxl/cdat: CXL CDAT Data Object Exchange implementation")
> > > Cc: Huai-Cheng Kuo <hchkuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > This only becomes a problem with the addition of DCDs so I'm not going to rush it in.
> 
> That makes sense.
> 
> > Btw cc qemu-devel on qemu patches!
> > 
> 
> Ah...  yea my bad.

Might I also ask for a more prominent way to quickly identify kernel vs
qemu patches, like a "[QEMU PATCH]" prefix? I tend to look for "hw/" in
the diff path names, but the kernel vs qemu question is ambiguous when
looking at the linux-cxl Patchwork queue.

@Jonathan, what do you think of having the kernel patchwork-bot watch
your tree for updating patch state (if it is not happening already).