Re: [PATCH v18 04/26] drm/shmem-helper: Refactor locked/unlocked functions

[Maxime Ripard]

On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 02:43:16PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> On 12/4/23 15:55, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >> Okay, that means s/_locked/_nolock/ in drm_gem_shmem_helpers.{c,h}, I
> >> guess.
> 
> DRM subsys and majority of kernel uses common _locked postfix. We should
> retain the old naming scheme by using _locked() in DRM. It's not
> worthwhile changing the name to a much less popular variant for a no
> good reason.
> 
> Maxime, are you okay with keeping the _locked name?

Yeah... I still don't really like it, but you're right that it's best to
remain consistent over my opinion :)

Maxime

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature