Re: [PATCH net-next v9 3/4] vsock: update SO_RCVLOWAT setting callback

[Arseniy Krasnov]

On 14.12.2023 13:29, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 12:19:46PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>> Do not return if transport callback for SO_RCVLOWAT is set (only in
>> error case). In this case we don't need to set 'sk_rcvlowat' field in
>> each transport - only in 'vsock_set_rcvlowat()'. Also, if 'sk_rcvlowat'
>> is now set only in af_vsock.c, change callback name from 'set_rcvlowat'
>> to 'notify_set_rcvlowat'.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Maybe squash this with patch 2/4?

Done in v10

Thanks, Arseniy

> 
>> ---
>>  Changelog:
>>  v3 -> v4:
>>   * Rename 'set_rcvlowat' to 'notify_set_rcvlowat'.
>>   * Commit message updated.
>>
>>  include/net/af_vsock.h           | 2 +-
>>  net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c         | 9 +++++++--
>>  net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c | 4 ++--
>>  3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/net/af_vsock.h b/include/net/af_vsock.h
>> index e302c0e804d0..535701efc1e5 100644
>> --- a/include/net/af_vsock.h
>> +++ b/include/net/af_vsock.h
>> @@ -137,7 +137,6 @@ struct vsock_transport {
>>  	u64 (*stream_rcvhiwat)(struct vsock_sock *);
>>  	bool (*stream_is_active)(struct vsock_sock *);
>>  	bool (*stream_allow)(u32 cid, u32 port);
>> -	int (*set_rcvlowat)(struct vsock_sock *vsk, int val);
>>  
>>  	/* SEQ_PACKET. */
>>  	ssize_t (*seqpacket_dequeue)(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct msghdr *msg,
>> @@ -168,6 +167,7 @@ struct vsock_transport {
>>  		struct vsock_transport_send_notify_data *);
>>  	/* sk_lock held by the caller */
>>  	void (*notify_buffer_size)(struct vsock_sock *, u64 *);
>> +	int (*notify_set_rcvlowat)(struct vsock_sock *vsk, int val);
>>  
>>  	/* Shutdown. */
>>  	int (*shutdown)(struct vsock_sock *, int);
>> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>> index 816725af281f..54ba7316f808 100644
>> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>> @@ -2264,8 +2264,13 @@ static int vsock_set_rcvlowat(struct sock *sk, int val)
>>  
>>  	transport = vsk->transport;
>>  
>> -	if (transport && transport->set_rcvlowat)
>> -		return transport->set_rcvlowat(vsk, val);
>> +	if (transport && transport->notify_set_rcvlowat) {
>> +		int err;
>> +
>> +		err = transport->notify_set_rcvlowat(vsk, val);
>> +		if (err)
>> +			return err;
>> +	}
>>  
>>  	WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvlowat, val ? : 1);
>>  	return 0;
> 
> 
> 
> I would s
> 
>> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c
>> index 7cb1a9d2cdb4..e2157e387217 100644
>> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c
>> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c
>> @@ -816,7 +816,7 @@ int hvs_notify_send_post_enqueue(struct vsock_sock *vsk, ssize_t written,
>>  }
>>  
>>  static
>> -int hvs_set_rcvlowat(struct vsock_sock *vsk, int val)
>> +int hvs_notify_set_rcvlowat(struct vsock_sock *vsk, int val)
>>  {
>>  	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>  }
>> @@ -856,7 +856,7 @@ static struct vsock_transport hvs_transport = {
>>  	.notify_send_pre_enqueue  = hvs_notify_send_pre_enqueue,
>>  	.notify_send_post_enqueue = hvs_notify_send_post_enqueue,
>>  
>> -	.set_rcvlowat             = hvs_set_rcvlowat
>> +	.notify_set_rcvlowat      = hvs_notify_set_rcvlowat
>>  };
>>  
>>  static bool hvs_check_transport(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
>> -- 
>> 2.25.1
>