Re: [PATCH v3] iio: sx9324: avoid copying property strings

From: Stephen Boyd
Date: Wed Dec 13 2023 - 19:59:10 EST


Quoting Justin Stitt (2023-12-11 16:42:52)
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9324.c b/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9324.c
> index 438f9c9aba6e..e3bc30b57b19 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9324.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/proximity/sx9324.c
> @@ -873,6 +873,32 @@ static int sx9324_init_compensation(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> 20000, 2000000);
> }
>
> +static u32 sx9324_parse_phase_prop(struct device *dev,

return u8? because that's the type of struct sx_common_reg_default::def.

> + struct sx_common_reg_default *reg_def,
> + int idx, const char *prop)
> +{
> + unsigned int pin_defs[SX9324_NUM_PINS];
> + int count, ret, pin;
> + u8 default_def;
> + u32 raw = 0;
> +
> + default_def = sx9324_default_regs[idx].def;

Do we need to do this? Isn't this reg_def->def?

> +
> + count = device_property_count_u32(dev, prop);
> + if (count != ARRAY_SIZE(pin_defs))
> + return default_def;

return reg_def->def?

> + ret = device_property_read_u32_array(dev, prop, pin_defs,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(pin_defs));
> + if (ret)
> + return default_def;

return reg_def->def?

> +
> + for (pin = 0; pin < SX9324_NUM_PINS; pin++)
> + raw |= (pin_defs[pin] << (2 * pin)) &
> + SX9324_REG_AFE_PH0_PIN_MASK(pin);
> +
> + return raw;
> +}
> +
> static const struct sx_common_reg_default *
> sx9324_get_default_reg(struct device *dev, int idx,
> struct sx_common_reg_default *reg_def)
> @@ -884,35 +910,30 @@ sx9324_get_default_reg(struct device *dev, int idx,
> #define SX9324_PIN_DEF "semtech,ph0-pin"
> #define SX9324_RESOLUTION_DEF "semtech,ph01-resolution"
> #define SX9324_PROXRAW_DEF "semtech,ph01-proxraw-strength"

Can you send a followup to remove these defines?

> - unsigned int pin_defs[SX9324_NUM_PINS];
> - char prop[] = SX9324_PROXRAW_DEF;
> + const char *prop = SX9324_PROXRAW_DEF;

This can be left unassigned now, right?

> u32 start = 0, raw = 0, pos = 0;
> - int ret, count, ph, pin;
> const char *res;
> + int ret;