Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v3 1/8] dt-bindings: phy: mediatek,xfi-pextp: add new bindings

From: Andrew Lunn
Date: Wed Dec 13 2023 - 08:21:18 EST

Next message: Andy Shevchenko: "Re: [PATCH v5 03/13] pinctrl: ingenic: Use C99 initializers in PINCTRL_PIN_GROUP()"
Previous message: Ronald Monthero: "Re: [PATCH] mm/zswap: Improve with alloc_workqueue() call"
In reply to: Conor Dooley: "Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v3 1/8] dt-bindings: phy: mediatek,xfi-pextp: add new bindings"
Next in thread: Daniel Golle: "Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v3 1/8] dt-bindings: phy: mediatek,xfi-pextp: add new bindings"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Because it is only present in one of the two SerDes channels.
> Channel 0 needs the work-around, Channel 1 doesn't.

Does the channel know its own number?

Andrew

Next message: Andy Shevchenko: "Re: [PATCH v5 03/13] pinctrl: ingenic: Use C99 initializers in PINCTRL_PIN_GROUP()"
Previous message: Ronald Monthero: "Re: [PATCH] mm/zswap: Improve with alloc_workqueue() call"
In reply to: Conor Dooley: "Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v3 1/8] dt-bindings: phy: mediatek,xfi-pextp: add new bindings"
Next in thread: Daniel Golle: "Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v3 1/8] dt-bindings: phy: mediatek,xfi-pextp: add new bindings"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]