Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: mm: Always make sw-dirty PTEs hw-dirty in pte_modify

From: Will Deacon
Date: Mon Dec 11 2023 - 13:42:45 EST


On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 05:26:46PM +0000, James Houghton wrote:
> Make it impossible to create a sw-dirty, hw-clean PTE with pte_modify.
> Such a PTE should be impossible to create, and there may be places that
> assume that pte_dirty() implies pte_hw_dirty().
>
> Signed-off-by: James Houghton <jthoughton@xxxxxxxxxx>

I'm not sure how, but you seem to be missing the '---' separator and the
diffstat here, so I suspect this might confuse tools such as b4 which try
to apply the patch directly.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index b19a8aee684c..79ce70fbb751 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -834,6 +834,12 @@ static inline pte_t pte_modify(pte_t pte, pgprot_t newprot)
> pte = set_pte_bit(pte, __pgprot(PTE_DIRTY));
>
> pte_val(pte) = (pte_val(pte) & ~mask) | (pgprot_val(newprot) & mask);
> + /*
> + * If we end up clearing hw dirtiness for a sw-dirty PTE, set hardware
> + * dirtiness again.
> + */
> + if (pte_sw_dirty(pte))
> + pte = pte_mkdirty(pte);
> return pte;

Looks like this is a fix for Catalin to pick up (patch #1 isn't necessary
afaict).

Will