Re: [PATCH] usb: fotg210-hcd: delete an incorrect bounds test

[Linus Walleij]

Hi Dan,

thanks for your patch!

On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 10:23 AM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Here "temp" is the number of characters that we have written and "size"
> is the size of the buffer.  The intent was clearly to say that if we have
> written to the end of the buffer then stop.
>
> However, for that to work the comparison should have been done on the
> original "size" value instead of the "size -= temp" value.  Not only
> will that not trigger when we want to, but there is a small chance that
> it will trigger incorrectly before we want it to and we break from the
> loop slightly earlier than intended.
>
> This code was recently changed from using snprintf() to scnprintf().  With
> snprintf() we likely would have continued looping and passed a negative
> size parameter to snprintf().  This would have triggered an annoying
> WARN().  Now that we have converted to scnprintf() "size" will never
> drop below 1 and there is no real need for this test.  We could change
> the condition to "if (temp <= 1) goto done;" but just deleting the test
> is cleanest.

This is a great fix! Thanks for going the extra mile and fix this
when looking at the code.

> Fixes: 1dd33a9f1b95 ("usb: fotg210: Collect pieces of dual mode controller")

That's the wrong commit.
This commit just brings stuff together from old code...

I believe it should be:
Fixes: 7d50195f6c50 ("usb: host: Faraday fotg210-hcd driver")

It won't backport cleanly but it's the right commit.

> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>

With the right Fixes:
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>

Yours,
Linus Walleij