Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] pwm: rename pwm_apply_state() to pwm_apply_might_sleep()

[Uwe Kleine-König]

On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 09:13:34AM +0000, Sean Young wrote:
> In order to introduce a pwm api which can be used from atomic context,
> we will need two functions for applying pwm changes:
> 
> 	int pwm_apply_might_sleep(struct pwm *, struct pwm_state *);
> 	int pwm_apply_atomic(struct pwm *, struct pwm_state *);
> 
> This commit just deals with renaming pwm_apply_state(), a following
> commit will introduce the pwm_apply_atomic() function.
> 
> Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Young <sean@xxxxxxxx>

Not a in-detail-review, but I just noticed again, that we have

	K:      pwm_(config|apply_state|ops)

in MAINTAINERS. That one needs adaption, too.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature