Re: [PATCH 0/5] staging: rtl8192e: patch series renames (5) different variables

[Gary Rookard]

Philipp Hortmann <philipp.g.hortmann@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 12/8/23 02:55, Gary Rookard wrote:
>> Hi,
>> This patch series renames 5 different variables with the checkpatch
>> coding style issue, Avoid CamelCase.
>> Patch 1/5) renamed variable bCurShortGI40MHz
>> Patch 2/5) renamed variable bcurShortGI20MHz
>> Patch 3/5) renamed variable CCKOFDMRate
>> Patch 4/5) renamed variable HTIOTActIsCCDFsync
>> Patch 5/5) renamed variable IOTPeer
>> Signed-off-by: Gary Rookard <garyrookard@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Gary Rookard (5):
>>    staging: rtl8192e: renamed variable bCurShortGI40MHz
>>    staging: rtl8192e: renamed variable bCurShortGI20MHz
>>    staging: rtl8192e: renamed variable CCKOFDMRate
>>    staging: rtl8192e: renamed variable HTIOTActIsCCDFsync
>>    staging: rtl8192e: renamed variable IOTPeer
>>   .../staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/r8192E_dev.c    |  4 +-
>>   drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_dm.c    | 22 +++----
>>   drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_HT.h         |  6 +-
>>   drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_HTProc.c     | 58 +++++++++----------
>>   drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtllib_tx.c          |  4 +-
>>   5 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>> 
>
>
> Please use present-tense as outlined here:
> https://kernelnewbies.org/PatchPhilosophy
> So rename instead of renamed
>
> Please use a more unique Subject for your coverletter.
> It often cannot cover everything. But more unique is better.
>
>
>
> Tested-by: Philipp Hortmann <philipp.g.hortmann@xxxxxxxxx>

Okay, will use "rename" instead past simple tense "renamed"

The coverletter(s) are having a repetition problem, I can add an
numeric value to their Subject lines to "unique" them as there is not much
else available to do so with.

Regards,
Gary
-- 
Sent with my mu4e on Gentoo GNU/linux.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature