Re: [PATCH RESEND v1 1/7] dt-bindings: clock: mpfs: add more MSSPLL output definitions

[Conor Dooley]

On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 09:40:00AM -0800, Emil Renner Berthing wrote:
> Conor Dooley wrote:
> > From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > There are 3 undocumented outputs of the MSSPLL that are used for the CAN
> > bus, "user crypto" module and eMMC. Add their clock IDs so that they can
> > be hooked up in DT.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  include/dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h | 5 +++++
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h
> > index 79775a5134ca..b52f19a2b480 100644
> > --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h
> > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h
> > @@ -44,6 +44,11 @@
> >
> >  #define CLK_RTCREF	33
> >  #define CLK_MSSPLL	34
> > +#define CLK_MSSPLL0	34
> 
> You add this new CLK_MSSPLL0 macro with the same value as CLK_MSSPLL, but
> never seem to use it in this series. Did you mean to rename the CLK_MSSPLL
> instances CLK_MSSPLL0?

Yes, that was my intention.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature