Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] irqchip: Introduce RTD1319 support using the Realtek common interrupt controller driver

From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Fri Dec 08 2023 - 10:37:40 EST


On Wed, Nov 29 2023 at 13:43, James Tai wrote:
> Add support for the RTD1319 platform.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> Closes:
> https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311061208.hJmxGqym-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/

Again: These tags are just wrong.

> +static struct platform_driver realtek_intc_rtd1319_driver = {
> + .probe = rtd1319_intc_probe,
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "realtek_intc_rtd1319",
> + .of_match_table = realtek_intc_rtd1319_dt_matches,
> + .suppress_bind_attrs = true,
> + .pm = &realtek_intc_rtd1319_pm_ops,
> + },

.probe = rtd1319_intc_probe,
.driver = {
.name = "realtek_intc_rtd1319",
.of_match_table = realtek_intc_rtd1319_dt_matches,
....

Please.

> +};
> +
> +static int __init realtek_intc_rtd1319_init(void)
> +{
> + return platform_driver_register(&realtek_intc_rtd1319_driver);
> +}
> +core_initcall(realtek_intc_rtd1319_init);

What? This can be built as a module. So how is core_initcall() in any
way correct here? module_init() perhaps?

Thanks,

tglx