Re: [PATCHv5 0/2] Fix imx53-ppd UART configuration

[Uwe Kleine-König]

[Cc += dt maintainers]

On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 07:50:36PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> IMHO PATCHv4 was better, but in the end I don't have strong feelings
> about this. Btw. I think this patchset is a good demonstration of
> frustrating upstream kernel development can be considering PATCHv5
> is basically the same as PATCHv1. Thanks for making us go in
> circles :(

I still like v4 better than v1/v5. I'm sorry for the frustration this
created on your side. 

I'd ask Greg to reconsider given that dt is less flexible than a sysfs
knob and otherwise shares all downsides of sysfs (people don't want to
have to tune that, so a useful default for most cases is important; you
have to consult documentation to understand how to tune it).

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature