[PATCH] dt-bindings: rtc: qcom-pm8xxx: fix inconsistent example

From: Johan Hovold
Date: Thu Nov 30 2023 - 12:32:07 EST


The PM8921 is an SSBI PMIC but in the binding example it is described
as being part of an SPMI PMIC while using an SSBI address.

Make the example consistent by using the sibling PM8941 SPMI PMIC
instead.

Fixes: 8138c5f0318c ("dt-bindings: rtc: qcom-pm8xxx-rtc: Add qcom pm8xxx rtc bindings")
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../bindings/rtc/qcom-pm8xxx-rtc.yaml | 36 +++++++++----------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/qcom-pm8xxx-rtc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/qcom-pm8xxx-rtc.yaml
index 774c34c3f8f6..cdc56dfbfac3 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/qcom-pm8xxx-rtc.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/qcom-pm8xxx-rtc.yaml
@@ -67,27 +67,27 @@ additionalProperties: false

examples:
- |
+ #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
#include <dt-bindings/spmi/spmi.h>
- spmi_bus: spmi@c440000 {
- reg = <0x0c440000 0x1100>;
- #address-cells = <2>;
- #size-cells = <0>;
- pmicintc: pmic@0 {
- reg = <0x0 SPMI_USID>;
- compatible = "qcom,pm8921";
- interrupts = <104 8>;
- #interrupt-cells = <2>;
- interrupt-controller;
- #address-cells = <1>;
+
+ spmi {
+ #address-cells = <2>;
#size-cells = <0>;

- pm8921_rtc: rtc@11d {
- compatible = "qcom,pm8921-rtc";
- reg = <0x11d>;
- interrupts = <0x27 0>;
- nvmem-cells = <&rtc_offset>;
- nvmem-cell-names = "offset";
+ pmic@0 {
+ compatible = "qcom,pm8941", "qcom,spmi-pmic";
+ reg = <0x0 SPMI_USID>;
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+
+ rtc@6000 {
+ compatible = "qcom,pm8941-rtc";
+ reg = <0x6000>, <0x6100>;
+ reg-names = "rtc", "alarm";
+ interrupts = <0x0 0x61 0x1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ nvmem-cells = <&rtc_offset>;
+ nvmem-cell-names = "offset";
+ };
};
- };
};
...
--
2.41.0