RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v5 5/5] i40e: Remove VEB recursion

From: Pucha, HimasekharX Reddy
Date: Thu Nov 30 2023 - 00:23:37 EST


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Ivan Vecera
> Sent: Friday, November 24, 2023 8:34 PM
> To: intel-wired-lan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Drewek, Wojciech <wojciech.drewek@xxxxxxxxx>; netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Brandeburg, Jesse <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx>; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>; Nguyen, Anthony L <anthony.l.nguyen@xxxxxxxxx>; Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxx>; Keller, Jacob E <jacob.e.keller@xxxxxxxxx>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx>; Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>; David S . Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v5 5/5] i40e: Remove VEB recursion
>
> The VEB (virtual embedded switch) as a switch element can be
> connected according datasheet though its uplink to:
> - Physical port
> - Port Virtualizer (not used directly by i40e driver but can
> be present in MFP mode where the physical port is shared
> between PFs)
> - No uplink (aka floating VEB)
>
> But VEB uplink cannot be connected to another VEB and any attempt
> to do so results in:
>
> "i40e 0000:02:00.0: couldn't add VEB, err -EIO aq_err I40E_AQ_RC_ENOENT"
>
> that indicates "the uplink SEID does not point to valid element".
>
> Remove this logic from the driver code this way:
>
> 1) For debugfs only allow to build floating VEB (uplink_seid == 0)
> or main VEB (uplink_seid == mac_seid)
> 2) Do not recurse in i40e_veb_link_event() as no VEB cannot have
> sub-VEBs
> 3) Ditto for i40e_veb_rebuild() + simplify the function as we know
> that the VEB for rebuild can be only the main LAN VEB or some
> of the floating VEBs
> 4) In i40e_rebuild() there is no need to check veb->uplink_seid
> as the possible ones are 0 and MAC SEID
> 5) In i40e_vsi_release() do not take into account VEBs whose
> uplink is another VEB as this is not possible
> 6) Remove veb_idx field from i40e_veb as a VEB cannot have
> sub-VEBs
>
> Tested using i40e debugfs interface:
> 1) Initial state
> [root@cnb-03 net-next]# CMD="/sys/kernel/debug/i40e/0000:02:00.0/command"
> [root@cnb-03 net-next]# echo dump switch > $CMD
> [root@cnb-03 net-next]# dmesg -c
> [ 98.440641] i40e 0000:02:00.0: header: 3 reported 3 total
> [ 98.446053] i40e 0000:02:00.0: type=19 seid=392 uplink=160 downlink=16
> [ 98.452593] i40e 0000:02:00.0: type=17 seid=160 uplink=2 downlink=0
> [ 98.458856] i40e 0000:02:00.0: type=19 seid=390 uplink=160 downlink=16
>
> 2) Add floating VEB
> [root@cnb-03 net-next]# echo add relay > $CMD
> [root@cnb-03 net-next]# dmesg -c
> [ 122.745630] i40e 0000:02:00.0: added relay 162
> [root@cnb-03 net-next]# echo dump switch > $CMD
> [root@cnb-03 net-next]# dmesg -c
> [ 136.650049] i40e 0000:02:00.0: header: 4 reported 4 total
> [ 136.655466] i40e 0000:02:00.0: type=19 seid=392 uplink=160 downlink=16
> [ 136.661994] i40e 0000:02:00.0: type=17 seid=160 uplink=2 downlink=0
> [ 136.668264] i40e 0000:02:00.0: type=19 seid=390 uplink=160 downlink=16
> [ 136.674787] i40e 0000:02:00.0: type=17 seid=162 uplink=0 downlink=0
>
> 3) Add VMDQ2 VSI to this new VEB
> [root@cnb-03 net-next]# dmesg -c
> [ 168.351763] i40e 0000:02:00.0: added VSI 394 to relay 162
> [ 168.374652] enp2s0f0np0v0: NIC Link is Up, 40 Gbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: None
> [root@cnb-03 net-next]# echo dump switch > $CMD
> [root@cnb-03 net-next]# dmesg -c
> [ 195.683204] i40e 0000:02:00.0: header: 5 reported 5 total
> [ 195.688611] i40e 0000:02:00.0: type=19 seid=394 uplink=162 downlink=16
> [ 195.695143] i40e 0000:02:00.0: type=17 seid=162 uplink=0 downlink=0
> [ 195.701410] i40e 0000:02:00.0: type=19 seid=392 uplink=160 downlink=16
> [ 195.707935] i40e 0000:02:00.0: type=17 seid=160 uplink=2 downlink=0
> [ 195.714201] i40e 0000:02:00.0: type=19 seid=390 uplink=160 downlink=16
>
> 4) Try to delete the VEB
> [root@cnb-03 net-next]# echo del relay 162 > $CMD
> [root@cnb-03 net-next]# dmesg -c
> [ 239.260901] i40e 0000:02:00.0: deleting relay 162
> [ 239.265621] i40e 0000:02:00.0: can't remove VEB 162 with 1 VSIs left
>
> 5) Do PF reset and check switch status after rebuild
> [root@cnb-03 net-next]# echo pfr > $CMD
> [root@cnb-03 net-next]# echo dump switch > $CMD
> [root@cnb-03 net-next]# dmesg -c
> ...
> [ 272.333655] i40e 0000:02:00.0: header: 5 reported 5 total
> [ 272.339066] i40e 0000:02:00.0: type=19 seid=394 uplink=162 downlink=16
> [ 272.345599] i40e 0000:02:00.0: type=17 seid=162 uplink=0 downlink=0
> [ 272.351862] i40e 0000:02:00.0: type=19 seid=392 uplink=160 downlink=16
> [ 272.358387] i40e 0000:02:00.0: type=17 seid=160 uplink=2 downlink=0
> [ 272.364654] i40e 0000:02:00.0: type=19 seid=390 uplink=160 downlink=16
>
> 6) Delete VSI and delete VEB
> [ 297.199116] i40e 0000:02:00.0: deleting VSI 394
> [ 299.807580] i40e 0000:02:00.0: deleting relay 162
> [ 309.767905] i40e 0000:02:00.0: header: 3 reported 3 total
> [ 309.773318] i40e 0000:02:00.0: type=19 seid=392 uplink=160 downlink=16
> [ 309.779845] i40e 0000:02:00.0: type=17 seid=160 uplink=2 downlink=0
> [ 309.786111] i40e 0000:02:00.0: type=19 seid=390 uplink=160 downlink=16
>
> Reviewed-by: Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e.h | 1 -
> .../net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_debugfs.c | 8 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c | 176 ++++++++----------
> 3 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-)
>

Tested-by: Pucha Himasekhar Reddy <himasekharx.reddy.pucha@xxxxxxxxx> (A Contingent worker at Intel)