Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: pressure: add honeywell,hsc030

[Rob Herring]

On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 09:47:57AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 29/11/2023 09:44, Petre Rodan wrote:
> > 
> > hi,
> > 
> > On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 09:04:17AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 29/11/2023 08:04, Petre Rodan wrote:
> >>> Adds binding for digital Honeywell TruStability HSC and SSC series
> >>> pressure and temperature sensors.
> >>> Communication is one way. The sensor only requires 4 bytes worth of
> >>> clock pulses on both i2c and spi in order to push the data out.
> >>> The i2c address is hardcoded and depends on the part number.
> >>> There is no additional GPIO control.
> >>
> >> Your threading is broken (not existing) since v4, making it difficult to
> >> apply the patchset. Please fix it when sending v6.
> > 
> > I'm confused.
> > 
> > you mean the lack of 'In-Reply-To' and 'References' headers in the emails
> > `git send-email` is generating?
> > I've added them for v2, but was told that was a mistake [1]
> > 
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231125191915.7f1f2dc4@jic23-huawei/

The instructions there were don't thread v2 to v1. Here, we're talking 
about threading within this version.

> > 
> > I'm probably misunderstanding something.
> > also, I hope v5 is flawless enough.
> 
> No, v5 is still wrong. Patchset should be threaded. Open lore.kernel.org
> and look how patchsets are organized and how your patchset is done.
> 
> It is as simple as:
> git format-patch -v6 -2
> scripts/get_maintainers.pl
> git send-email v6*

By default, git does the right thing, but the '--thread' option could be 
changed in your config. Note both commands can do the threading. If you 
are mucking with 'In-Reply-To' then it is probably wrong.

Rob