Re: [PATCH RESEND v2] Documentation: xfs: consolidate XFS docs into its own subdirectory

From: Bagas Sanjaya
Date: Wed Nov 29 2023 - 02:13:01 EST


On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 09:24:00PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 08:32:55AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 07:45:22PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> > > XFS docs are currently in upper-level Documentation/filesystems.
> > > Although these are currently 4 docs, they are already outstanding as
> > > a group and can be moved to its own subdirectory.
> > >
> > > Consolidate them into Documentation/filesystems/xfs/.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > Changes since v1 [1]:
> > >
> > > * Also update references to old doc path to address kernel test robot
> > > warnings [2].
> > >
> > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/20231121095658.28254-1-bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx/
> > > [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/a9abc5ec-f3cd-4a1a-81b9-a6900124d38b@xxxxxxxxx/
> > >
> > > Documentation/filesystems/index.rst | 5 +----
> > > Documentation/filesystems/xfs/index.rst | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > > .../{ => xfs}/xfs-delayed-logging-design.rst | 0
> > > .../{ => xfs}/xfs-maintainer-entry-profile.rst | 0
> > > .../{ => xfs}/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst | 2 +-
> > > .../{ => xfs}/xfs-self-describing-metadata.rst | 0
> > > .../maintainer/maintainer-entry-profile.rst | 2 +-
> > > MAINTAINERS | 4 ++--
> > > 8 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > > create mode 100644 Documentation/filesystems/xfs/index.rst
> > > rename Documentation/filesystems/{ => xfs}/xfs-delayed-logging-design.rst (100%)
> > > rename Documentation/filesystems/{ => xfs}/xfs-maintainer-entry-profile.rst (100%)
> > > rename Documentation/filesystems/{ => xfs}/xfs-online-fsck-design.rst (99%)
> > > rename Documentation/filesystems/{ => xfs}/xfs-self-describing-metadata.rst (100%)
> >
> > I think the rst filename should drop the 'xfs-' prefix, e.g.
> >
> > Documentation/filesystems/xfs/delayed-logging-design.rst
> >
> > since that seems to be what most filesystems do:
>
> Actually, ignore this suggestion. I forgot that I have vim paths
> trained on the Documentation/filesystems/ directory, which means I'll
> lose the ability to
>
> :f xfs-online-fsck-design.rst
>
> and pop it open. Not that I expect many more filesystems to grow online
> fsck capabilities, but you get the point...

So is it OK to just move the the docs and keeping their basename intact (as I
did here)?

> > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > > index ea790149af7951..fd288ac57e19fb 100644
> > > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > > @@ -23893,10 +23893,10 @@ S: Supported
> > > W: http://xfs.org/
> > > C: irc://irc.oftc.net/xfs
> > > T: git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfs-linux.git
> > > -P: Documentation/filesystems/xfs-maintainer-entry-profile.rst
> > > +P: Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-maintainer-entry-profile.rst
> > > F: Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-xfs
> > > F: Documentation/admin-guide/xfs.rst
> > > -F: Documentation/filesystems/xfs-*
> > > +F: Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-*
> >
> > Shouldn't this be "Documentation/filesystems/xfs/*" ?
>
> ...though this suggestion remains standing.

OK, will fix it up in v3.

--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature