Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] dt-bindings: stm32: add clocks and reset binding for stm32mp25 platform

[Gabriel FERNANDEZ]

On 11/23/23 13:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 23/11/2023 10:39, Gabriel FERNANDEZ wrote:
>
> > ok i will use '
> > > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/st,stm32mp25-rcc.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/st,stm32mp25-rcc.h
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 000000000000..9876ee0dd1e4
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/st,stm32mp25-rcc.h
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,492 @@
> > > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-3-Clause */
> > > Any particular reason why do you need 3-clause BSD? Checkpatch asks for
> > > different one, because that one clause is just annoying.
> > Yes, the same file can also be used in other components, such as
> > TF-A/OPTEE, and can therefore have a dual licence.
> That's not what I asked. I asked: why do you choose different dual
> license then we ask for (as expressed in checkpatch).


Sorry for the delay, i checked with our licensing experts and we 
concluded that there was no particular reason to use BSD-3-clause 
instead of the BSD-2-clause model.


I'm sending back a new version under GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause 
license model.

Best Regards

Gabriel


> Best regards,
> Krzysztof