Re: [PATCH 5/5] ASoC: codecs: Add WCD939x Codec driver

From: Neil Armstrong
Date: Tue Nov 28 2023 - 04:22:24 EST


On 25/11/2023 13:07, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
On 23.11.2023 15:49, Neil Armstrong wrote:

<snip>

+
+static int wcd939x_io_init(struct snd_soc_component *component)
+{
+ snd_soc_component_write_field(component, WCD939X_ANA_BIAS,
+ WCD939X_BIAS_ANALOG_BIAS_EN, 1);
All of these values are BIT()s or 2-4 ORed BIT()s, can you check what they
mean?

Same for almost all other snd_soc_component_ write/modify functions

Ack


[...]

+static int wcd939x_tx_swr_ctrl(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w,
+ struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, int event)
+{
+ struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_soc_dapm_to_component(w->dapm);
+ struct wcd939x_priv *wcd939x = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component);
+ int bank;
+ int rate;
+
+ bank = (wcd939x_swr_get_current_bank(wcd939x->sdw_priv[AIF1_CAP]->sdev)) ? 0 : 1;
+ bank = bank ? 0 : 1;
this is just the return value of wcd939x_swr_get_current_bank NOTed twice

Yep, I also found it wild, will simplify


+
+ switch (event) {
+ case SND_SOC_DAPM_PRE_PMU:
+ if (strnstr(w->name, "ADC", sizeof("ADC"))) {
+ int i = 0, mode = 0;
+
+ if (test_bit(WCD_ADC1, &wcd939x->status_mask))
+ mode |= tx_mode_bit[wcd939x->tx_mode[WCD_ADC1]];
+ if (test_bit(WCD_ADC2, &wcd939x->status_mask))
+ mode |= tx_mode_bit[wcd939x->tx_mode[WCD_ADC2]];
+ if (test_bit(WCD_ADC3, &wcd939x->status_mask))
+ mode |= tx_mode_bit[wcd939x->tx_mode[WCD_ADC3]];
+ if (test_bit(WCD_ADC4, &wcd939x->status_mask))
+ mode |= tx_mode_bit[wcd939x->tx_mode[WCD_ADC4]];
+
+ if (mode != 0) {
+ for (i = 0; i < ADC_MODE_ULP2; i++) {
+ if (mode & (1 << i)) {
BIT(i)

Ack


+ i++;
+ break;
+ }
the immediate break makes it look like you're just looking for the first set
bit, 1-indexed, and there's functions for that

Indeed, let's use that


+ }
+ }
+ rate = wcd939x_get_clk_rate(i);
+ wcd939x_set_swr_clk_rate(component, rate, bank);
+ /* Copy clk settings to active bank */
+ wcd939x_set_swr_clk_rate(component, rate, !bank);
This comment is very confusing

It is, not sure if I can clarify it more


[...]

+static void wcd939x_mbhc_get_result_params(struct snd_soc_component *component,
+ s16 *d1_a, u16 noff,
+ int32_t *zdet)
very weird alignment

Will fix


+{
+ struct wcd939x_priv *wcd939x = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component);
+ int i;
+ int val, val1;
+ s16 c1;
+ s32 x1, d1;
+ s32 denom;
+ static const int mincode_param[] = {
static inside a function means something else than static global

+ 3277, 1639, 820, 410, 205, 103, 52, 26
+ };
reverse-Christmas-tree

Will fix


+
+ regmap_update_bits(wcd939x->regmap, WCD939X_ANA_MBHC_ZDET, 0x20, 0x20);
+ for (i = 0; i < WCD939X_ZDET_NUM_MEASUREMENTS; i++) {
+ regmap_read(wcd939x->regmap, WCD939X_ANA_MBHC_RESULT_2, &val);
+ if (val & 0x80)
BIT(7), please name it
Will fix


+ break;
+ }
+ val = val << 0x8;
<< 8 makes more sense

Will fix


+ regmap_read(wcd939x->regmap, WCD939X_ANA_MBHC_RESULT_1, &val1);
+ val |= val1;
+ regmap_update_bits(wcd939x->regmap, WCD939X_ANA_MBHC_ZDET, 0x20, 0x00);
BIT()s
Will fix


+ x1 = WCD939X_MBHC_GET_X1(val);
+ c1 = WCD939X_MBHC_GET_C1(val);
+ /* If ramp is not complete, give additional 5ms */
+ if (c1 < 2 && x1)
+ usleep_range(5000, 5050);
udelay, see timers-howto.txt
Will fix


[...]

+static void wcd939x_wcd_mbhc_qfuse_cal(struct snd_soc_component *component,
+ s32 *z_val, int flag_l_r)
+{
+ s16 q1;
+ int q1_cal;
+
+ q1 = snd_soc_component_read(component, WCD939X_DIGITAL_EFUSE_REG_21 + flag_l_r);
+ if (q1 & 0x80)
BIT
+ q1_cal = (10000 - ((q1 & 0x7F) * 10));
GENMASK
Will fix


+ else
+ q1_cal = (10000 + (q1 * 10));
+ if (q1_cal > 0)
+ *z_val = ((*z_val) * 10000) / q1_cal;
+}
+
+static void wcd939x_wcd_mbhc_calc_impedance(struct snd_soc_component *component,
+ u32 *zl, uint32_t *zr)
+{
+ struct wcd939x_priv *wcd939x = dev_get_drvdata(component->dev);
+ s16 reg0, reg1, reg2, reg3, reg4;
+ s32 z1l, z1r, z1ls;
+ int z_mono, z_diff1, z_diff2;
+ bool is_fsm_disable = false;
+ struct wcd939x_mbhc_zdet_param zdet_param[] = {
const
Will fix


+ {4, 0, 4, 0x08, 0x14, 0x18}, /* < 32ohm */
+ {4, 0, 6, 0x18, 0x60, 0x78}, /* 32ohm < Z < 400ohm */
+ {1, 4, 5, 0x18, 0x7C, 0x90}, /* 400ohm < Z < 1200ohm */
+ {1, 6, 7, 0x18, 0x7C, 0x90}, /* >1200ohm */
+ };
+ struct wcd939x_mbhc_zdet_param *zdet_param_ptr = NULL;
+ s16 d1_a[][4] = {
const
Will fix


+ {0, 30, 90, 30},
+ {0, 30, 30, 6},
+ {0, 30, 30, 5},
+ {0, 30, 30, 5},
+ };
+ s16 *d1 = NULL;
????
Will fix


[...]

+
+ rc = of_property_read_u32(np, "qcom,micbias1-microvolt", &prop_val);
similarly to the swr port map, this should be commonized for WCDxxxx

Yes, but where ?



Konrad

Thanks,
Neil