Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] dm-raid: delay flushing event_work() after reconfig_mutex is released

From: Song Liu
Date: Mon Nov 27 2023 - 19:00:44 EST


+ dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 12:00 AM Yu Kuai <yukuai1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> After commit db5e653d7c9f ("md: delay choosing sync action to
> md_start_sync()"), md_start_sync() will hold 'reconfig_mutex', however,
> in order to make sure event_work is done, __md_stop() will flush
> workqueue with reconfig_mutex grabbed, hence if sync_work is still
> pending, deadlock will be triggered.
>
> Fortunately, former pacthes to fix stopping sync_thread already make sure
> all sync_work is done already, hence such deadlock is not possible
> anymore. However, in order not to cause confusions for people by this
> implicit dependency, delay flushing event_work to dm-raid where
> 'reconfig_mutex' is not held, and add some comments to emphasize that
> the workqueue can't be flushed with 'reconfig_mutex'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/md/dm-raid.c | 3 +++
> drivers/md/md.c | 11 ++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
> index a4692f8f98ee..51f15c20f621 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
> @@ -3317,6 +3317,9 @@ static void raid_dtr(struct dm_target *ti)
> mddev_lock_nointr(&rs->md);
> md_stop(&rs->md);
> mddev_unlock(&rs->md);
> +
> + if (work_pending(&rs->md.event_work))
> + flush_work(&rs->md.event_work);
> raid_set_free(rs);
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
> index fb8a7d1eebee..86efc9c2ae56 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/md.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
> @@ -82,6 +82,14 @@ static struct module *md_cluster_mod;
>
> static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(resync_wait);
> static struct workqueue_struct *md_wq;
> +
> +/*
> + * This workqueue is used for sync_work to register new sync_thread, and for
> + * del_work to remove rdev, and for event_work that is only set by dm-raid.
> + *
> + * Noted that sync_work will grab reconfig_mutex, hence never flush this
> + * workqueue whith reconfig_mutex grabbed.
> + */
> static struct workqueue_struct *md_misc_wq;
> struct workqueue_struct *md_bitmap_wq;
>
> @@ -6328,9 +6336,6 @@ static void __md_stop(struct mddev *mddev)
> struct md_personality *pers = mddev->pers;
> md_bitmap_destroy(mddev);
> mddev_detach(mddev);
> - /* Ensure ->event_work is done */
> - if (mddev->event_work.func)
> - flush_workqueue(md_misc_wq);
> spin_lock(&mddev->lock);
> mddev->pers = NULL;
> spin_unlock(&mddev->lock);
> --
> 2.39.2
>